| 2 |
Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 2327-3798 ; EISSN: 2327-3801 ; Language, Cognition and Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02103505 ; Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Taylor and Francis, 2018, 34 (3), pp.385-404. ⟨10.1080/23273798.2018.1549332⟩ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The Role of Morphology in Word Recognition of Hebrew as a Templatic Language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Pronoun processing in Anglophone late L2 learners of French: Behavioral and ERP evidence
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0911-6044 ; Journal of Neurolinguistics ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01485313 ; Journal of Neurolinguistics, Elsevier, 2015, Vol. 34, pp.15-40 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Syntactic Competence and Processing: Constraints on Long-distance A-bar Dependencies in Bilinguals.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Second Language Acquisition of Korean Case by Learners with Different First Languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Generativism and Emergentism: Evidence From Second Language Acquisition Studies of Poverty of the Stimulus Phenomena
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Pronoun processing in Anglophone late L2 learners of French: Behavioral and ERP evidence
|
|
|
|
In: EuroSLA 20 ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01507646 ; EuroSLA 20, Sep 2014, York, United Kingdom (2014)
|
|
Abstract:
Abstract: This study investigated offline, behavioral, and online cortical responses to French clitic and strong pronouns by two groups of anglophone learners (L2) and native French controls. English in situ object pronouns behave morphosyntactically like full lexical noun phrases (I saw Bill/I saw him), whereas in French they are cliticized to the verb (J'ai vu Guillaume/Je l'ai vu/*J'ai vu le/lui). We used ERPs, known to be sensitive to word order and morphological violations in natives, to investigate neural responses to word order violations of in situ pronouns. Results indicate native sensitivity to ungrammatical in situ pronoun placement in offline (grammaticality judgment (GJ)), as well as online end-of-sentence and ERP responses, notably a robust P600. L2 groups demonstrated distinct capacities according to level. Both high- and low-intermediates showed online cortical sensitivity to ungrammatical in situ prounouns, producing a P600 in response to such violations (though with distributions that sometimes differed from native controls). However, on behavioural measures the L2 groups differed, both from natives and from each other. Native controls correctly rejected more in situ clitic and strong pronouns than both the L2 groups, and the high-intermediate group correctly rejected more than the low-intermediate group. For natives, the similarity of online/offline responses confirmed a grammaticalized representation and processing of pronouns. Both groups of learners showed a stronger ERP response to in situ pronoun placement than behavioral data would suggest. This is especially true for low-intermediate learners who, despite high rates of acceptance of strong pronouns/clitics in situ, showed a cortical response in the P600 window though without the canonical topography of the native response. While both learner groups are apparently using (at least some) L1 English settings for pronoun placement, their cortical response clearly demonstrates unconscious increasing sensitivity to French parameters.
|
|
Keyword:
[SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics; [SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01507646
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
