1 |
The Visual System Prioritizes High-Level Scene Properties for Attentional Selection
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Why do we retrace our visual steps? Semantic and episodic memory in gaze reinstatement
|
|
|
|
In: Learn Mem (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Where the Action Could Be: Speakers Look at Graspable Objects and Meaningful Scene Regions when Describing Potential Actions
|
|
|
|
In: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Meaning and Attentional Guidance in Scenes: A Review of the Meaning Map Approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Meaning Guides Attention During Scene Viewing Even When It Is Irrelevant
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description.
|
|
|
|
In: Scientific reports, vol 8, iss 1 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Intelligent analysis of a visual scene requires that important regions be prioritized and attentionally selected for preferential processing. What is the basis for this selection? Here we compared the influence of meaning and image salience on attentional guidance in real-world scenes during two free-viewing scene description tasks. Meaning was represented by meaning maps capturing the spatial distribution of semantic features. Image salience was represented by saliency maps capturing the spatial distribution of image features. Both types of maps were coded in a format that could be directly compared to maps of the spatial distribution of attention derived from viewers’ eye fixations in the scene description tasks. The results showed that both meaning and salience predicted the spatial distribution of attention in these tasks, but that when the correlation between meaning and salience was statistically controlled, only meaning accounted for unique variance in attention. The results support theories in which cognitive relevance plays the dominant functional role in controlling human attentional guidance in scenes. The results also have practical implications for current artificial intelligence approaches to labeling real-world images.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6131246/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202075 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31894-5
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
Word Frequency Effects in Naturalistic Reading
|
|
|
|
In: Lang Cogn Neurosci (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner's 40 year legacy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Toward Semantics in the Wild: Activation to Manipulable Nouns in Naturalistic Reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Eye-Movements Are Not Task Specific in Individuals with Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|