DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 8 of 8

1
Fading perceptual resemblance: A path for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to conceptual matching?
In: Cognition. - Amsterdam [u.a] : Elsevier 129 (2013) 3, 598-614
OLC Linguistik
Show details
2
Baboons, like humans, solve analogy by categorical abstraction of relations
In: ISSN: 1435-9448 ; EISSN: 1435-9456 ; Animal Cognition ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01439660 ; Animal Cognition, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2013, 16 (3), pp.519-524. ⟨10.1007/s10071-013-0596-0⟩ (2013)
BASE
Show details
3
Fading Perceptual Resemblance: A Path for Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) to Conceptual Matching?
BASE
Show details
4
An Analogical Paradox for Nonhuman Primates: Bridging the Perceptual-Conceptual Gap
In: Psychology Dissertations (2010)
BASE
Show details
5
Darwin's mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds : [including open peer commentary and authors' response]
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 31 (2008) 3, 109-178
BLLDB
Show details
6
Analogical apes and paleological monkeys revisited
In: Behavioral and brain sciences. - New York, NY [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 31 (2008) 2, 149
OLC Linguistik
Show details
7
What Meaning Means for Same and Different: Analogical Reasoning in Humans (Homo sapiens), Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
Abstract: Thus far, language- and token-trained apes (e.g., D. Premack, 1976; R. K. R. Thompson, D. L. Oden, & S. T. Boysen, 1997) have provided the best evidence that nonhuman animals can solve, complete, and construct analogies, thus implicating symbolic representation as the mechanism enabling the phenomenon. In this study, the authors examined the role of stimulus meaning in the analogical reasoning abilities of three different primate species. Humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) completed the same relational matching-to-sample (RMTS) tasks with both meaningful and nonmeaningful stimuli. This discrimination of relations-between-relations serves as the basis for analogical reasoning. Meaningfulness facilitated the acquisition of analogical matching for human participants, whereas individual differences among the chimpanzees suggest that meaning can either enable or hinder their ability to complete analogies. Rhesus monkeys did not succeed in the RMTS task regardless of stimulus meaning, suggesting that their ability to reason analogically, if present at all, may be dependent on a dimension other than the representational value of stimuli.
Keyword: Article
URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.176
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206216
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18489233
BASE
Hide details
8
What Meaning Means for Same and Different: A Comparative Study in Analogical Reasoning
In: Psychology Theses (2006)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
5
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern