1 |
An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Sci (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Assessing Parent Behaviours in Parent–Child Interactions with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Infants Aged 0–3 Years: A Systematic Review
|
|
|
|
In: J Clin Med (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Assessing Parent-Child Interaction in Infant Deafness
|
|
|
|
In: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists.
|
|
|
|
In: Ali, Myzoon Soroli, Efstathia Jesus, Luis M. T. Cruice, Madeline Isaksen, Jytte Visch-Brink, Evy Grohmann, Kleanthes K. Jagoe, C. Kukkonen, Tarja Varlokosta, Spyridoula Hernández Sacristán, Carlos Rosell Clari, Vicent Palmer, Rebecca Martinez Ferreiro, Silvia Godecke, Erin Wallace, Sarah J. McMenamin, Ruth Copland, David Breitenstein, Caterina Bowen, Audrey Laska, Ann-Charlotte Hilari, Katerina Brady, Marian C. 2021 An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists. Aphasiology 1 21 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Technology‐enhanced reading therapy for people with aphasia: findings from a quasi‐randomized waitlist controlled study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: results of a quasi-randomized waitlist controlled study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Reporting interventions in communication partner training: a critical review and narrative synthesis of the literature
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Background: Communication partner training (CPT) is an umbrella term for a complex behavioural intervention for communications partners (CPs) of people with aphasia (PWA) and possibly PWA themselves, with many interacting components, deployed in flexible ways. Recent systematic reviews (Simmons-Mackie, Raymer, Armstrong, Holland, & Cherney, 2010; Simmons-Mackie, Raymer, & Cherney, 2016) have highlighted the effectiveness of CPT in addressing the skills of conversation partners and the communicative participation of people with aphasia but have suggested that CPT has been variably delivered, with no clear picture of what the essential elements of CPT are and how CPT is expected to achieve its results through hypothesised mechanisms of change (Coster, 2013). Aim: This paper aims broadly to consider specification of CPT and describes how CPT has been conducted overall and in relation to treatment recipients. Recommendations for CPT and areas for future research are considered. Methods & Procedures: A critical review and narrative synthesis was carried out through: (i) the systematic application of the 12-item TIDieR checklist (Hoffmann et al., 2014) to the 56 studies appraised in the Simmons-Mackie et al. (2010, 2016)) reviews, providing a quantitative overview of the completeness of CPT intervention reporting; and (ii) a qualitative synthesis of the reviewed CPT literature according to TIDieR items. Outcomes & Results: Half of the TIDieR checklist items were reported by 71% or more of the studies, and the rest of the items were reported by 0–63% of studies. TIDieR items relating to the treatment (goal, rationale or theory of essential elements, materials and procedures) and provision (provider, mode, timing, dose) were more frequently reported; however, the level of detail provided was often inadequate or incomplete. The interventions were insufficiently specified to enable replication for most of the studies considered. The most infrequently reported items were: name, location, intervention tailoring and modification, and planned and actual intervention adherence/fidelity. Conclusion: For a better understanding of an intervention, it is necessary to identify and describe potentially central elements and perhaps especially in complex interventions as CPT, where it is likely also more difficult. Whilst the reviewed CPT studies are on average reporting on slightly more than half of the TIDieR items, they are overall insufficiently detailed. Some items appear easier to report on, whereas other items have not been attended to, are too complex in nature to give a full report on, or simply have not been relevant for the individual study to include
|
|
URL: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/67193/ https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/67193/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1482406
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|