| 1 |
Proper name anomia with preserved lexical and semantic knowledge after left anterior temporal lesion: A two-way convergence defect
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0010-9452 ; Cortex ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02344887 ; Cortex, Elsevier, 2015, 65, pp.1-18. ⟨10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.008⟩ (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Establishing criterion validity for the French version of the Screening BAT: A comparison of 30 aphasic patient's performance on the Screening BAT and the MT-‐86 alpha and beta
|
|
|
|
In: 16th Sciences of Aphasia ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01202366 ; 16th Sciences of Aphasia, Sep 2015, Aveiro, Portugal. 20 (Supplement 2), 2015, Stem- Spraak- en Taalpathologie ; http://www.soa-online.com/ (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; The aim of the present study was to provide data on the validity of the Screening BAT through the comparison of the scores of 30 French aphasic patients on the French version of the Screening BAT with the scores obtained on the Montreal-Toulouse Protocol (MT86) in its long and short version (M1-alpha and M1-bêta). The MT86-alpha is a short version which has been standardised with 60 healthy participants (Dordain et al. 1983). The MT86-bêta is a more detailed test battery and has been standardised in several steps between 1990 and 1993 (Béland & Lecours, 1990; Béland et al, 1993). The M1-bêta still is the standard for aphasia assessment in large parts of France, Belgium and francophone Canada, while the M1-alpha is frequently used with patients in the acute phase. Both tests are based on a large choice of task involving all linguistic levels and modalities, very similar to the BAT and the Screening BAT. For the present study, 30 aphasic patients in the chronic phase (without specific knowledge of other languages) were recruited in order to be able to respond to the long version of the MT-86-bêta. Patients had a mean age of 66,4 years (ranging from 49-88, SD 12,89), there were 17 men and 13 women and most of them (except 4) had more than 9 years of education. 22 were affected by non-fluent aphasia, 8 by fluent aphasia. Mean onset of aphasia was 5 years (ranging from 8 month to 25 years and one month). All patients responded to the French version of the Screening BAT and the M1-alpha in one session, to the M1-beta in another session. Sessions 1 and 2 were counterbalanced across participants and conducted with an interval of minimum 2 and maximum 8 weeks. We present correlations obtained between the three tests and between the subtests included in each. The discussion will focus on the patients’ linguistic profile established with the three tests.
|
|
Keyword:
[SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics; [SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology; [SCCO]Cognitive science; aphasia; assessment; neuropsychology; test validity
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01202366/file/SOA-Poster.pdf
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01202366
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01202366/document
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
