| 1 |
Phylogenetics of Indo-European Language Families via an Algebro-Geometric Analysis of Their Syntactic Structures
|
|
|
|
In: Springer International Publishing (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Evaluating the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Context-Free Grammars
|
|
|
|
In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Deterministic Parsing: A Modern View
|
|
|
|
In: North East Linguistics Society (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Colorless green ideas do sleep furiously: gradient acceptability and the nature of the grammar
|
|
|
|
In: De Gruyter (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
The slings and arrows of comparative linguistics
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The integration hypothesis of human language evolution and the nature of contemporary languages
|
|
|
|
In: Frontiers (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Language: UG or Not to Be, That Is the Question
|
|
|
|
In: Public Library of Science (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
How Could Language Have Evolved?
|
|
|
|
In: Public Library of Science (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
The mystery of language evolution
|
|
|
|
In: Frontiers Research Foundation (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Conceptual and Methodological Problems with Comparative Work on Artificial Language Learning
|
|
|
|
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 8 (2014); 120-129 ; 1450-3417 (2014)
|
|
Abstract:
Several theoretical proposals for the evolution of language have sparked a renewed search for comparative data on human and non-human animal computational capacities. However, conceptual confusions still hinder the field, leading to experimental evidence that fails to test for comparable human competences. Here we focus on two conceptual and methodological challenges that affect the field generally: 1) properly characterizing the computational features of the faculty of language in the narrow sense; 2) defining and probing for human language-like computations via artificial language learning experiments in non-human animals. Our intent is to be critical in the service of clarity, in what we agree is an important approach to understanding how language evolved.
|
|
Keyword:
artificial language learning; faculty of language in the narrow sense; Q; recursion
|
|
URL: http://www.biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/340
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 17 |
The integration hypothesis of human language evolution and the nature of contemporary languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
