2 |
On the interplay of object animacy and verb type during sentence comprehension in German: ERP evidence from the processing of transitive dative and accusative constructions
|
|
|
|
DNB Subject Category Language
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Production of prosodic cues in coordinate name sequences addressing varying interlocutors
|
|
|
|
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 12, No 1 (2021); 1 ; 1868-6354 (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
Prosodic boundaries can be used to disambiguate the syntactic structure of coordinated name sequences (coordinates). To answer the question whether disambiguating prosody is produced in a situationally dependent or independent manner and to contribute to our understanding of the nature of the prosody-syntax link, we systematically explored variability in the prosody of boundary productions of coordinates evoked by different contextual settings in a referential communication task. Our analysis focused on prosodic boundaries produced to distinguish sequences with different syntactic structures (i.e., with or without internal grouping of the constituents). In German, these prosodic boundaries are indicated by three major prosodic cues: f0-range, final lengthening, and pause. In line with the Proximity/Anti-Proximity principle of the syntax-prosody model by Kentner and Féry (2013), speakers clearly use all three cues for constituent grouping and prosodically mark groups within and at their right boundary, indicating that prosodic phrasing is not a local phenomenon. Intra-individually, we found a rather stable prosodic pattern across contexts. However, inter-individually speakers differed from each other with respect to the prosodic cue combinations that they (consistently) used to mark the boundaries. Overall, our data speak in favour of a close link between syntax and prosody and for situational independence of disambiguating prosody.
|
|
Keyword:
coordinates; duration; f0; pause; pre-final lengthening; Prosodic boundaries; prosodic cues; Psycholinguistics; variability; varying interlocutors
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.221 https://www.journal-labphon.org/jms/article/view/221
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
5 |
Gradual development of non-adjacent dependency learning during early childhood
|
|
|
|
In: Dev Cogn Neurosci (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Children’s Learning of Non-adjacent Dependencies Using a Web-Based Computer Game Setting
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Die Konkurrenz schläft nie! : Evidenz für den lexikalischen Wettbewerb mit semantischen Nachbarn in der Wortproduktion bei älteren Sprachgesunden und aphasischen Personen
|
|
|
|
DNB Subject Category Language
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Die Konkurrenz schläft nie! ... : Evidenz für den lexikalischen Wettbewerb mit semantischen Nachbarn in der Wortproduktion bei älteren Sprachgesunden und aphasischen Personen ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Spektrum Patholinguistik Band 12. Schwerpunktthema: Weg(e) mit dem Stottern: Therapie und Selbsthilfe für Kinder und Erwachsene
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Common Ground Information Affects Reference Resolution: Evidence From Behavioral Data, ERPs, and Eye-Tracking
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Linguistic and non-linguistic non-adjacent dependency learning in early development
|
|
|
|
In: Dev Cogn Neurosci (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
The impact of focus particles on the recognition and rejection of contrastive alternatives ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Transfereffekte nach Arbeitsgedächtnistraining bei Aphasie ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|