| 1 |
The Critical Period Hypothesis for L2 Acquisition: An Unfalsifiable Embarrassment?
|
|
|
|
In: Languages ; Volume 6 ; Issue 3 (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
This article focuses on the uncertainty surrounding the issue of the Critical Period Hypothesis. It puts forward the case that, with regard to naturalistic situations, the hypothesis has the status of both “not proven” and unfalsified. The article analyzes a number of reasons for this situation, including the effects of multi-competence, which remove any possibility that competence in more than one language can ever be identical to monolingual competence. With regard to the formal instructional setting, it points to many decades of research showing that, as critical period advocates acknowledge, in a normal schooling situation, adolescent beginners in the long run do as well as younger beginners. The article laments the profusion of definitions of what the critical period for language actually is and the generally piecemeal nature of research into this important area. In particular, it calls for a fuller integration of recent neurolinguistic perspectives into discussion of the age factor in second language acquisition research.
|
|
Keyword:
age factor; age of acquisition; critical period hypothesis; multi-competence; puberty; scrutinized nativelikeness; second-language acquisition; ultimate attainment
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030149
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Detection of Gender-Biased Items in the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
|
|
|
|
In: Languages ; Volume 4 ; Issue 2 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
