| 1 |
First language versus second language effect on memory for motion events: The role of language type and proficiency
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Are linguistic prediction deficits characteristic of adults with dyslexia?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Confession to Make: Inadvertent Confessions and Admissions in United Kingdom and United States Police Contexts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Confession to Make: Inadvertent Confessions and Admissions in United Kingdom and United States Police Contexts
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Are Linguistic Prediction Deficits Characteristic of Adults with Dyslexia?
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Sci (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Bilingual memory advantage: Bilinguals use a common linguistic pattern as an aid to recall memory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The Complex Adaptive System Principles model for bilingualism: Language interactions within and across bilingual minds
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Evidence-gathering in police interviews: Communication problems in evidence-gathering and possible solutions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Speaking in a second language but thinking in the first language: Language-specific effects on memory for causation events in English and Spanish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Interpreting meaning in police interviews: Applied Language Typology in a Forensic Linguistics context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Juggling investigation and interpretation: The problematic dual role of police officer-interpreter
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Applying language typology:Practical applications of research on typological contrasts between languages
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This chapter illustrates the benefits of applying insights from language typologies in order to afford better understanding of both theoretical and practical implications of language contrasts. It examines the practical consequences of certain typological contrasts for different professional contexts of communication, such as translation, second language acquisition and teaching, and the law. For the purpose of the present volume we focus on the cognitive domain of motion. Our analysis of the relevant motion event lexicalization phenomena is based on the three central criteria that underlie the research within Applied Language Typology (ALT): (i) presence versus absence of lexical and grammatical categories, (ii) more versus less restrictive lexical and grammatical categories, and (iii) complementarity in the distribution of categories. In this chapter, we discuss a select number of examples of lexicalization of motion and dynamic spatial relations (e.g. speaker and Figure positioning) across typologically different languages and we show how the ALT criteria enable us to identify exact points of language contrast that cause practical difficulty. Finally, we suggest future directions for ALT research that benefits both academic researchers and language practitioners alike.
|
|
URL: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/57880/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Applied Language Typology:Applying typological insights in professional practice
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
