1 |
L1 Influence vs. Universal Mechanisms : An SLA-Driven Corpus Study on Temporal Expression
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables [<Journal>]
|
|
|
|
DNB Subject Category Language
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Temporal adverbials in the acquisition of pasttime reference: A cross-sectional study of L1 German and Cantonese learners of English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Using Corpora in Language Teaching: Resources, Methods, and Evaluations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language : a multi-method approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL : Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English of advanced German learners
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In this pilot study we set out to compare formulaic sequences of the type of 3-grams in ENL (spoken British English), EFL (English spoken by advanced German learners of English) and ESL (spoken Indian English). The study shows that, for the overall number of types and tokens, there are no significant differences between ENL and ESL, but there are significantly fewer 3-grams in EFL vs. ENL. A comparison of the common core (i.e. the 3-grams all three variants have in common) reveals that these common-core 3-grams are significantly more frequently used in ESL and EFL-variants compared to ENL. A functional analysis shows differences in the distribution of the 3-grams across the variants. A study of the variant-specific 3-grams reveals less variability in EFL vs. ENL but a higher number and variability of both types and tokens in ESL. ; 22 page(s)
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/155913
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|