Home Catalogue search

eng

Refine your search:

Search in the Catalogues and Directories






	Sort by
Simple Search

Page: 1 2 3 4

Hits 1 – 20 of 70

1	Corpus-based approach meets LFG: Puzzling voice alternation in Indonesian
	Gede Primahadi Wijaya Rajeg (3375653); I Made Rajeg (4052377); I Wayan Arka (8405279). - 2020
	BASE
	Show details

2	Representation and parsing of multiword expressions ... : Current trends ...
	Unkn Unknown. - : Freie Universität Berlin, 2019
	BASE
	Show details

3	Argument realization: grammatical function and case assignment
	Yang, Fengrong. - : Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2019
	In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2019)
	BASE
	Show details

4	Aspects of Kusaal grammar - the syntax-information structure interface
	Abubakari, Hasiyatu. - 2018
	BASE
	Show details

5	The possessive passive in portuguese: a lexicalist approach with a computational implementation
	Leonel Figueiredo de Alencar
	In: Fórum Linguístico, Vol 15, Iss 4, Pp 3333-3356 (2018) (2018)
	BASE
	Show details

6	The syntax of Sanskrit compounds ...
	Lowe, John J.. - : Journal of Historical Syntax, 2017
	BASE
	Show details

7	The syntax of Sanskrit compounds
	Lowe, John J.
	In: Journal of Historical Syntax; Language 91 (3) ; 2163-6001 (2017)
	BASE
	Show details

8	Mapping theory without argument structure
	Findlay, JY. - 2017
	BASE
	Show details

9	For a unified treatment of particle verbs ; Pour un traitement unifie des verbes a particules
	Clément, Lionel; Diao, Sekou
	In: Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01572338 ; Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Jul 2016, Varsovie, Poland. Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, 2016 ; http://headlex16.ipipan.waw.pl/ (2016)
	Abstract: International audience ; The problem (1) a. The student gave it up. b. The student moved the box up. In English, as well as in other languages, there exists a class of verbs composed of a collocation between a verb, and a particle which appears in a distinct syntactic position: the particle verbs. It is not clear if particles are morphological or syntactic elements (Martin Forst, Tracy Holloway King and Tibor Laczkó (2010)). From now on, we will adopt a syntactic treatment of particles in this paper. Particle verb constructions can be compositional or idiomatic. In compositional constructions such as 1b, the meaning of the combination of the two morphosyntactic elements is partly predictable from the meaning of each separate element, whereas in idiomatic constructions 1a, the meaning of the combined elements is idiosyncratic, requiring a specific lexical entry for the idiomatic particle verbs. Idiomatic constructions Idiomatic constructions of particle verbs are those constructions where the meaning and the argument structure of the particle verb can not be derived from composing the meaning and argument structure of the verb and its particle. Idiomatic particle verbs must then be listed in the lexicon. (2) a. John gave Mary the book. b. John gave the book to Mary. c. John gave up playing the piano. d. John gave up his house. e. John gave up on her. In (2), we can see that gave takes three arguments < SUBJ, [OBJ1 \| OBJ2], [OBJ2 \| OBLto] > while gave up takes two arguments < SUBJ, [OBJ1 \| XCOMP \| OBLon] > As the argument structure of gave and gave up are different (as illustrated in 2) while the other mor-phosyntactic information such as tense, aspect, agreement etc. are shared between the two verbs, only the sub-categorization frame of the particle verb gave up is listed in the lexicon. The remainder of the feature-structure of the particle verb is provided by the information in the lexical entry of gave. Productive constructions Productive constructions of particle verbs are those constructions where the meaning and argument structure of the particle verb is predictable from composing the meaning and argument structure of the verb and the particle. These constructions are highly productive in English, especially with adverbial particles such as up, down, by and new uses of verb + particle constructions in a productive setting are regularly appearing in corpora. It is therefore uneconomical to list all the potential uses of productive particle verb constructions in the lexicon. (3) a. John shot the ball. b. The pilot shot the plane down. The known solutions A satisfactory solution is the analysis of verbal particles introduced in the English and German ParGram ([2] grammars (Martin Forst, Tracy Holloway King and Tibor Laczkó (2010)). They propose • The compositional particule verbs are composed in the syntax. • Idiomatic constructions are listed in the lexicon and have PRED values which are composed of the particle and the verb. • The argument structure of these composed constructions may differ from the main verb. • C-structure rules take into account the morphological analysis of particle verbs for German and Hungarian. They note that systematically analyzing particle verbs as idiomatic constructions is a problem for the coverage of computational grammars, as every possible combination of a verb and a particle should explicitly be listed in the lexicon. However, some verb + particle combinations are highly productive and the particle may contribute the same meaning or the same discursive context in each case, it should therefore be more parsimonious if compositional constructions were generated on the fly by the parser. Our solution Our solution is very close to the one proposed by Forth et al. The main significant differences were driven by the composition of PRED for productive particle verbs: The composed PRED is systematic: • The lemma is the concatenation of the verb stem and particle (similar to ParGram) • The Sub-categorization is a combination of particle's subcat and verb's subcat. • The argument structure is a combination of particle's one and verb's one. • The particle's F-Structure and verb's F-Structure are unified in order to combine the semantic and syntactic properties of each. We use the XLFG ([4]) parser/framework which provides us with tools to efficiently combine lexical entries as we will show in the next section. It is well known that compositional particle verb constructions may be productive ([7]), a fact which can be difficult to handle in an electronic lexicon with a wide coverage. Our approach seems to gracefully handle this difficulty for computational linguistics: each lexical entry for non-compositional idiomatic particle verb contains only idiomatic information such as predicate argument structure and sub-categorization frame. It allows us to capture the fact that the argument structure of an idiomatic particle verb can differ from the argument structure of the same verb without a particle. (4) a. The student gave it up. b. The student moved the box up. The approach we have taken to handle particle verb constructions combines these two strategies: we list all idiomatic particle verbs in the lexicon and generate compositional particle verb construction by combining the syntactic information contributed by both the verb and its particle.
	Keyword: [SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics; LFG; Linguistics
	URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01572338/file/clement-sekou-2-1.pdf https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01572338/document https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01572338
	BASE
	Hide details

10	XLFG Documentation
	Clément, Lionel
	In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01277648 ; 2016 (2016)
	BASE
	Show details

11	An LFG analysis of pronominal binding in Mandarin Chinese
	Dong, Hongyuan
	In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 1 (2016): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 2:1–15 ; 2473-8689 (2016)
	BASE
	Show details

12	Modeling syntactic properties of MWEs in LFG
	Waszczuk, Jakub; Savary, Agata
	In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01174660 ; 2015 (2015)
	BASE
	Show details

13	Case and grammatical functions in Imbabura Quechua: An LFG approach
	Willgohs, Beatriz; Farrell, Patrick
	In: Willgohs, Beatriz; & Farrell, Patrick. (2014). Case and grammatical functions in Imbabura Quechua: An LFG approach. Proceedings of LFG, 9. UC Davis: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1s4652nb (2014)
	BASE
	Show details

14	La estructura informacional en la triplicación con clíticos del español rioplatense
	Estigarribia, Bruno
	In: Signo y seña, ISSN 2314-2189, Nº 25, 2014, pags. 105-132 (2014)
	BASE
	Show details

15	Constructions with Lexical Integrity
	Asudeh, A; Dalrymple, M; Toivonen, I
	In: Symplectic Elements at Oxford ; Added by author ; ORA review team (2013)
	BASE
	Show details

16	Propuesta de traducción sintáctico-semántica: el tratamiento anáforico a través de la LFG y la SDRT ; Proposal for a syntactic-semantic translation: anaphoric approach by LFG and SDRT
	Tordera Yllescas, Juan Carlos. - : Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 2012
	BASE
	Show details

17	Treebank-Based Deep Grammar Acquisition for French Probabilistic Parsing Resources
	Schluter, Natalie. - : Dublin City University. National Centre for Language Technology (NCLT), 2011. : Dublin City University. School of Computing, 2011
	In: Schluter, Natalie (2011) Treebank-Based Deep Grammar Acquisition for French Probabilistic Parsing Resources. PhD thesis, Dublin City University. (2011)
	BASE
	Show details

18	Antecedent-based approach to binding in Icelandic and Faroese
	Tania E. Strahan
	In: Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics, Vol 37 (2011) (2011)
	BASE
	Show details

19	Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles
	Corien Bary; Dag Trygve Truslew Haug
	In: Semantics and Pragmatics, Vol 4, Iss 0, Pp 1-56 (2011) (2011)
	BASE
	Show details

20	Inter- and intrasentential anaphora: the case of the Ancient Greek participle
	Bary, Corien; Haug, Dag
	In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 21; 373-392 ; 2163-5951 (2011)
	BASE
	Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4

© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern