Home Catalogue search

eng

Refine your search:

Search in the Catalogues and Directories






	Sort by
Simple Search

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...9

Hits 1 – 20 of 170

1	Lexicalization in the developing parser
	White, Aaron Steven; Lidz, Jeffrey
	In: Glossa Psycholinguistics, vol 1, iss 1 (2022)
	BASE
	Show details

2	Eighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies.
	Perkins, Laurel; Lidz, Jeffrey
	In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 118, iss 41 (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

3	Eighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies.
	Perkins, Laurel; Lidz, Jeffrey
	In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol 118, iss 41 (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

4	THE DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ITS INTERACTION WITH OTHER ASPECTS OF COGNITION: THE CASE OF MEDIAL WH-QUESTIONS IN ENGLISH AND IN BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE ...
	Grolla, Elaine; Liter, Adam; Lidz, Jeffrey. - : SciELO journals, 2021
	BASE
	Show details

5	THE DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ITS INTERACTION WITH OTHER ASPECTS OF COGNITION: THE CASE OF MEDIAL WH-QUESTIONS IN ENGLISH AND IN BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE ...
	Grolla, Elaine; Liter, Adam; Lidz, Jeffrey. - : SciELO journals, 2021
	BASE
	Show details

6	The effect of intonation on the illocutionary force of declaratives in child comprehension
	Goodhue, Daniel; Wehbe, Jad; Hacquard, Valentine...
	In: Sinn und Bedeutung; Bd. 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 307-324 ; Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung; Vol 25 (2021): Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25; 307-324 ; 2629-6055 (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

7	Eighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies
	Perkins, Laurel; Lidz, Jeffrey
	In: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

8	The Psycho-logic of Universal Quantifiers
	Knowlton, Tyler Zarus. - 2021
	Abstract: A universally quantified sentence like every frog is green is standardly thought to express a two-place second-order relation (e.g., the set of frogs is a subset of the set of green things). This dissertation argues that as a psychological hypothesis about how speakers mentally represent universal quantifiers, this view is wrong in two respects. First, each, every, and all are not represented as two-place relations, but as one-place descriptions of how a predicate applies to a restricted domain (e.g., relative to the frogs, everything is green). Second, while every and all are represented in a second-order way that implicates a group, each is represented in a completely first-order way that does not involve grouping the satisfiers of a predicate together (e.g., relative to individual frogs, each one is green).These “psycho-logical” distinctions have consequences for how participants evaluate sentences like every circle is green in controlled settings. In particular, participants represent the extension of the determiner’s internal argument (the cir- cles), but not the extension of its external argument (the green things). Moreover, the cognitive system they use to represent the internal argument differs depend- ing on the determiner: Given every or all, participants show signatures of forming ensemble representations, but given each, they represent individual object-files. In addition to psychosemantic evidence, the proposed representations provide explanations for at least two semantic phenomena. The first is the “conservativity” universal: All determiners allow for duplicating their first argument in their second argument without a change in informational significance (e.g., every fish swims has the same truth-conditions as every fish is a fish that swims). This is a puzzling gen- eralization if determiners express two-place relations, but it is a logical consequence if they are devices for forming one-place restricted quantifiers. The second is that every, but not each, naturally invites certain kinds of generic interpretations (e.g., gravity acts on every/#each object). This asymmetry can po- tentially be explained by details of the interfacing cognitive systems (ensemble and object-file representations). And given that the difference leads to lower-level con- comitants in child-ambient speech (as revealed by a corpus investigation), children may be able to leverage it to acquire every’s second-order meaning. This case study on the universal quantifiers suggests that knowing the meaning of a word like every consists not just in understanding the informational contribu- tion that it makes, but in representing that contribution in a particular format. And much like phonological representations provide instructions to the motor plan- ning system, it supports the idea that meaning representations provide (sometimes surprisingly precise) instructions to conceptual systems.
	Keyword: Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Meaning; Philosophy; Psycholinguistics; Psychosemantics; Quantification; Semantics
	URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1903/27869 https://doi.org/10.13016/fdr8-3qqh
	BASE
	Hide details

9	Determiners are "conservative" because their meanings are not relations: evidence from verification
	Knowlton, Tyler Zarus; Pietroski, Paul; Williams, Alexander...
	In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 30; 206-226 ; 2163-5951 (2021)
	BASE
	Show details

10	Sentence first, arguments afterward : essays in language and learning
	Chomsky, Noam (Verfasser eines Geleitwortes); Lidz, Jeffrey (Herausgeber); Gleitman, Lila R.. - New York : Oxford University Press, 2020
	BLLDB
	UB Frankfurt Linguistik
	Show details

11	Do 4-year-olds employ island constraints during sentence processing? ...
	Hochmuth, Gabriella; Hirzel, Mina; Lidz, Jeffrey. - : Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, 2020
	BASE
	Show details

12	Bootstrapping the Meanings of Each & Every ...
	Griffith, Meagan; Knowlton, Tyler; Lidz, Jeffrey. - : Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, 2020
	BASE
	Show details

13	Diagnosing Participant Number with Syntactic Bootstrapping
	Elky, Sophia. - 2020
	BASE
	Show details

14	Bootstrapping the Meanings of Each & Every
	Griffith, Meagan; Knowlton, Tyler; Lidz, Jeffrey. - 2020
	BASE
	Show details

15	Passive sentence constructions are known by everyone (even four-year olds)
	Liter, Adam; Kincaid, Katherine. - 2020
	BASE
	Show details

16	Do 4-year-olds employ island constraints during sentence processing?
	Hochmuth, Gabriella; Hirzel, Mina; Lidz, Jeffrey. - 2020
	BASE
	Show details

17	Prelinguistic Understanding of Collective & Distributive Events
	Deshpande, Stuti. - 2020
	BASE
	Show details

18	When is a Reflexive not a Reflexive? Near-reflexivity and Condition R
	Lidz, Jeffrey
	In: North East Linguistics Society (2020)
	BASE
	Show details

19	Prosody and Function Words Cue the Acquisition of Word Meanings in 18-Month-Old Infants
	De Carvalho, Alex,; He, Angela Xiaoxue; Lidz, Jeffrey...
	In: ISSN: 0956-7976 ; Psychological Science ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02951124 ; Psychological Science, Association for Psychological Science, 2019, 30 (3), pp.319-332. ⟨10.1177/0956797618814131⟩ (2019)
	BASE
	Show details

20	Prosody and Function Words Cue the Acquisition of Word Meanings in 18-Month-Old Infants ...
	Carvalho, Alex De; He, Angela Xiaoxue; Lidz, Jeffrey. - : Figshare, 2019
	BASE
	Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...9

© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern