DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3
Hits 1 – 20 of 55

1
Universal Dependencies 2.9
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2021
BASE
Show details
2
Universal Dependencies 2.8.1
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2021
BASE
Show details
3
Universal Dependencies 2.8
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2021
BASE
Show details
4
Universal Dependencies 2.7
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2020
BASE
Show details
5
Universal Dependencies 2.6
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2020
BASE
Show details
6
Universal Dependencies 2.5
Zeman, Daniel; Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2019
BASE
Show details
7
Universal Dependencies 2.4
Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell; Agić, Željko. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2019
BASE
Show details
8
Modification of DPs by epistemic adverbs
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 29; 477-495 ; 2163-5951 (2019)
BASE
Show details
9
Universal Dependencies 2.2
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01930733 ; 2018 (2018)
BASE
Show details
10
Universal Dependencies 2.3
Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell; Agić, Željko. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2018
BASE
Show details
11
Universal Dependencies 2.2
Nivre, Joakim; Abrams, Mitchell; Agić, Željko. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2018
BASE
Show details
12
Reciprocal scope revisited
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 28; 40-58 ; 2163-5951 (2018)
BASE
Show details
13
The PROIEL treebank family: a standard for early attestations of Indo-European languages [<Journal>]
Eckhoff, Hanne [Verfasser]; Bech, Kristin [Sonstige]; Bouma, Gerlof [Sonstige].
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
14
Universal Dependencies 2.1
In: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01682188 ; 2017 (2017)
BASE
Show details
15
Universal Dependencies 2.0 alpha (obsolete)
Nivre, Joakim; Agić, Željko; Ahrenberg, Lars. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2017
BASE
Show details
16
Universal Dependencies 2.0
Nivre, Joakim; Agić, Željko; Ahrenberg, Lars. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2017
BASE
Show details
17
Universal Dependencies 2.0 – CoNLL 2017 Shared Task Development and Test Data
Nivre, Joakim; Agić, Željko; Ahrenberg, Lars. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2017
BASE
Show details
18
Universal Dependencies 2.1
Nivre, Joakim; Agić, Željko; Ahrenberg, Lars. - : Universal Dependencies Consortium, 2017
BASE
Show details
19
Syntactic discontinuities in Latin – A treebank-based study
In: Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies (BeLLS); Årg 8 (2017): The very model of a modern linguist — in honor of Helge Dyvik ; Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies; Vol 8 (2017): The very model of a modern linguist — in honor of Helge Dyvik ; 1892-2449 ; 10.15845/bells.v8i1 (2017)
BASE
Show details
20
Syntactic nominalization in Latin ; Syntactic nominalization in Latin: A case of non-canonical subject agreement
In: ISSN: 0079-1636 ; EISSN: 1467-968X ; Transactions of the Philological Society ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01395309 ; Transactions of the Philological Society, Wiley, 2016, 114 (1), pp.25-50 (2016)
Abstract: International audience ; Much difficulty in the analysis of Latin constructions with dominant participles is caused by a typologically unusual pattern of subject agreement: instead of being assigned case according to their subject function (like, e.g., the accusative subjects of infinitives), subjects of participles appear in the same case as the participle itself. This study presents evidence against deriving dominant participle constructions from participles' attributive uses and argues that they should instead be analyzed as a syntactic nominalization in which the participle is the head that agrees with its subject in case. Our account relies on two separate components: (i) a clausal nominalization rule, introduced at the level of phrase structure, and closely resembling the structure of the English gerund; and (ii) a subject agreement rule, treated as a lexical property of Latin participles, and common to all their uses (not just the dominant use). Our synchronic account is supported by diachronic evidence, which suggests that the dominant participle construction developed in Latin through reanalysis of the absolute participle construction (shared by many ancient Indo-European languages). The change involved the introduction of a clausal nominalization rule, while the subject agreement rule was likely present from early on and not affected by the change.
Keyword: [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics; Latin; participles; subject agreement
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01395309
BASE
Hide details

Page: 1 2 3

Catalogues
6
1
6
0
3
1
1
Bibliographies
8
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
1
0
0
0
Open access documents
30
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern