Page: 1... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11... 2.306
121 |
THE ROLE OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ASPECTS IN THE LEARNING AND TEACHING SECOND LANGUAGE ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
124 |
The contributions of phonological awareness and decoding on spelling in isiXhosa Grade 3 readers ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
125 |
Learning vocabulary and syntax with and without redundancy ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
126 |
Phonological Contrast and Conflict in Dutch Vowels: Neurobiological and Psycholinguistic Evidence from Children and Adults ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
127 |
Rapport et Bilan Scientifique - 2e Symposium sur la Politique Linguistique Familiale 2021
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal-inalco.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03525635 ; [Rapport de recherche] INALCO, Sorbonne Paris-Cité (SPC). 2022 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
128 |
The Oral Production of Discourse Markers by Advanced Learners of Spanish
|
|
|
|
In: IULC Working Papers; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022): Volume 22 (1) ; 1524-2110 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
129 |
Stakeholders' Insights Into Migrant Students’ Experiences in a Thai Public School: A Linguistic Ecological Perspective
|
|
|
|
In: ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies ; 14 ; 2 ; 243-266 ; Multicultural Lingual and Multicultural Education (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
130 |
Evaluación y descripción del desarrollo del discurso narrativo en español
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
131 |
Course Progress in the General Integration Course
|
|
|
|
In: 7-2021 ; BAMF-Brief Analysis ; 13 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
132 |
Impact of factors specific to forced migration on German language acquisition: Family constellation, health status and housing situation
|
|
|
|
In: 4-2020 ; BAMF-Brief Analysis ; 13 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
133 |
The third wave of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey of Refugees: Refugees are improving their German language skills and continue to feel welcome in Germany
|
|
|
|
In: 1-2020 ; BAMF-Brief Analysis ; 18 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
134 |
How do L2 student moderators facilitate a peer-led discussion forum?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
135 |
Introduction to Language Development in Children: Description to Detect and Prevent Language Difficulties
|
|
|
|
In: Children, 2022, vol. 9, núm. 3, p. 412 ; Articles publicats (D-PS) (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
136 |
Relative clauses in child heritage speakers of Turkish in the United States
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
137 |
Spanish pragmatic markers' usage patterns in second language and heritage speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
138 |
Training in machine translation post-editing for foreign language students
|
|
Zhang, Hong; Torres-Hostench, Olga. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2022. : Center for Language & Technology, 2022. : (co-sponsored by Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning, University of Texas at Austin), 2022
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
139 |
Tracking linguistic change in childhood: Transmission, incrementation, and vernacular reorganization
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
140 |
L2 discourse markers and the development of interactional competence during study abroad
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In my dissertation, I use the theories and methodologies of Conversation Analysis (or “CA”, see Sacks et al., 1974) to investigate how speakers of a second language (or 'L2') develop the ability to interact in the L2 — or how they develop their interactional competence (or 'IC', see Hall & Pekarek Doehler, 2011). IC research has described how, over time, L2 speakers develop their IC by becoming able to perform actions, such as disagree (Pekarek Doehler & [Pochon-Berger], 2011), tell stories (Berger & Pekarek Doehler, 2018; Pekarek Doehler & Berger, 2018), and complain (Skogmyr Marian, 2021), more recognizably for their co-interactants. To perform such actions in interaction more recognizably, L2 speakers diversify the members' methods (Garfinkel, 1967, p. vii) they employ in performing those actions in the L2. While prior IC research has predominantly taken as an analytic starting point an action environment, I take as a starting a linguistic resource, specifically discourse markers. Discourse markers are words (e.g., English well, German also) or phrases (e.g., English y'know, German guck mal "look") which show the connection between discursive units and instruct co-interactants how to interpret some current turn at talk against the prior talk. Previous IC studies were able to describe developing L2 IC in terms of co-interactants' visible interpretations of L2 speakers' actions. Co-interactants, however, rarely display their understanding of the use of a particular linguistic resource. By taking discourse markers as an analytic starting point, my dissertation thus offers a different approach to and understanding of IC and its development. In my dissertation, I analyze the everyday interactions of two L2 speakers of German — Rachel and Nina — who are sojourning in Germany. First, I analyze speaker Rachel's use of the particle combination achja in sequence initial positions. In response to some information, L1 speakers of German use achja to claim remembering of that information (Betz & Golato, 2008). While Rachel exclusively uses achja in sequence-initial position, she takes advantage of achja's function as a claim of now-remembering to do some other interactional work, specifically to index now-remembering after a search, to backlink, and to do resumption (in combination with the particle also). Following these analyses, I explore the ways in which her experiences participating in German interaction as well as her L1 (English) could be influencing her use of achja also to accomplish resumption in everyday German interaction. I find that Rachel, while using resources from the L2, is transferring a strategy for resumption from her L1 into her L2 in her resumptions. I then do a longitudinal analysis (see Wagner et al., 2018) of Nina's use of the multi-functional discourse marker also. My analysis finds that Nina uses also at the beginning of the sojourn to maintain intersubjectivity and at the end to repair intersubjectivity. I describe Nina's trajectory of IC development through also as pruning, at term which captures both the growth/strengthening of new uses as well as the dropping of others. I also forward an understanding of IC as the ability to contribute to the organization of interaction, one that harkens back to Psathas' (1990) description of interactional competence as the ability to collaboratively produce structures of interaction. In my final chapter, I use my analytical findings to scrutinize the ethnomethodological notions of member and membership, both of which have been broadly described in CA research in terms of culture, society, and language (e.g., Hellermann, 2008, 2011; Robinson, 2016; Sacks, 1992; ten Have, 2002). I argue that, by using such a conceptualization of membership, CA and IC research do not accurately capture the ways in which interactants orient to each other's contributions in interactions, nor do the fields capture the nuanced and fluid nature of membership and differing access to methods that members may have. By diversifying the approaches we take to studying IC — e.g., by taking L2 linguistic resources as our starting points — we can deepen our understanding what it means to become interactionally competent in a second language.
|
|
Keyword:
conversation analysis; discourse markers; interactional competence; second language acquisition; study abroad
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/17978
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
Page: 1... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11... 2.306
|
|