2 |
Exploring Behavioral and Affective Correlates of Comprehensible Second Language Speech
|
|
|
|
In: World Languages and Cultures Publications (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Second language comprehensibility as a dynamic construct
|
|
|
|
In: World Languages and Cultures Publications (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about second language pronunciation teaching, their experience, and speech assessments ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about second language pronunciation teaching, their experience, and speech assessments ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
REVISED_Appendix_Teacher_pronunciation_beliefs – Supplemental material for Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about second language pronunciation teaching, their experience, and speech assessments ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
REVISED_Appendix_Teacher_pronunciation_beliefs – Supplemental material for Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about second language pronunciation teaching, their experience, and speech assessments ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility
|
|
|
|
In: World Languages and Cultures Publications (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Introducing Registered Reports at Language Learning: Promoting Transparency, Replication, and a Synthetic Ethic in the Language Sciences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
APPENDIX – Supplemental material for Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
APPENDIX – Supplemental material for Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Introducing Registered Reports at Language Learning: Promoting Transparency, Replication, and a Synthetic Ethic in the Language Sciences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: a validation and generalization study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Development of Second Language French Oral Skills in an Instructed Setting: A Focus on Speech Ratings
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Development of Second Language French Oral Skills in an Instructed Setting: A Focus on Speech Ratings
|
|
|
|
In: Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017): Special Issue: Current Perspectives on Oral Communicative Competence of French Second Language Speakers; 32-50 ; Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017): Numéro spécial : Perspectives actuelles sur la compétence de communication à l'oral en français langue seconde; 32-50 ; 1920-1818 ; 1481-868X (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
What do raters need in a pronunciation scale?:the users' view
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Perception and Pronunciation in Fluency Assessment
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This chapter argues that any definition of the construct of fluency must include the familiarity of the listener with the entire context of an utterance. This extends to pronunciation, the intelligibility of which is an interaction between the phonological content of the utterance and the familiarity of the listener with the second language (L2) speech produced by speakers from a specific first language (L1) background. This position recognizes that successful communication is not merely a matter of efficient cognitive processing on the part of the speaker. Fluency is as much about perception as it is about performance. This is a strong theoretical stance, which can be situated within an interactionist perpective on language use in applied linguistics (and social sciences more generally). Good theory generates specific predictions that may be empirically tested. If the listener is critical to the construct, we would expect to discover two facts. Firstly, that variation in listener familiarity with L2 speech results in changes to scores on speaking tests. Secondly, that this variation is associated with estimates of intelligibility when the speaker is kept constant. In this chapter we describe a study that investigates these two predictions. We situate the findings in the context of language testing, where variation in familiarity among raters is a cause for concern. ; Grants: European Commission: L2 COMMUNICATION - Fostering cross-cultural communication: Identifying the linguistic factors that promote comprehensibility in academic and workplace settings (303413) EUR 6,000 BPC fee funded by the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot ; Peer-reviewed ; Post-print ; 19
|
|
Keyword:
accent; intelligibility; language familiarity; Language Testing; pronunciation; Rasch analysis
|
|
URL: https://zenodo.org/record/165465#.W5Jexl5KiUm https://doi.org/10.21832/ISAACS6848 http://hdl.handle.net/2381/35971 http://www.multilingual-matters.com/display.asp?isb=9781783096831
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|