| 1 |
The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English:A corpus-based metapragmatic approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: a corpus-based metapragmatic approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The metapragmatics of consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
“The apology seemed (in)sincere”: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Indexical and sequential properties of criticisms in initial interactions: implications for examining (Im) politeness across cultures
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Modulating troubles affiliating in initial interactions the role of remedial accounts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Conversational lapses and laughter: towards a combinatorial approach to building collections in conversation analysis
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The practices by which actions are accomplished in interaction are invariably sensitive to context, as it is not only through their composition but also their position that they are recognisable as practices. This means that practices are not readily identifiable through straightforward searches for linguistic units in large datasets of spoken interaction. In this paper, we propose that through an explicitly combinatorial approach to search, the procedural basis of which is grounded in a specific array of compositional and sequential features associated with the candidate practice in question, we can more readily find potentially relevant examples of that phenomenon across large tracts of data, which can then be subjected to rigorous sequential analysis. We argue that this combinatorial search procedure enables us access to data from multiple different sources. We illustrate this combinatorial approach through an analysis of laughter that co-occurs with lapses in the ongoing progressivity of talk-in-interaction in various conversational settings. Careful analysis of post-lapse laughter in a dataset of initial interactions suggests that such laughter often occurs subsequent to silences greater than 500 ms and co-occurs with speaker change. We use these compositional and positional features to construct searches across different spoken corpora held within the Australian National Corpus in order to identify further possible examples of this candidate practice, thereby demonstrating the relevance of this approach for accessing data in conversation analytic research. We suggest that the advantage of an explicitly combinatorial approach to identifying practices, and the actions accomplished through them, is that it enables us to go beyond analysing them in single, isolated datasets, as well as opening up hitherto understudied practices for further investigation.
|
|
Keyword:
1203 Language and Linguistics; 1702 Artificial Intelligence; 3310 Linguistics and Language; Conversation analysis; Interactional pragmatics; Lapses; Laughter; Progressivity; Spoken corpora
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:03ce391
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 14 |
The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal account of conversational inference
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Divided by a common language? Jocular quips and (non-)affiliative responses in initial interactions among American and Australian speakers of English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Malefactive uses of giving/receiving expressions: the case of te-kureru in Japanese
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: toward a formal account of conversational inference
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
