1 |
Review of Mailhammer & Vennemann (2019): The Carthaginian North: Semitic Influence on Early Germanic: A Linguistic and Cultural Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Review: A Comparative Grammar of the Early Germanic Languages (2018), by R.D. Fulk ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Gothic – Morphology, Part 2 ... : Adjectives and Pronouns ...
|
|
Goering, Nelson. - : Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Gothic – Introduction, Part 1 ... : Linguistic Affiliations and External History ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Gothic – Introduction, Part 3 ... : Sources and Scholarly Resources ...
|
|
Goering, Nelson. - : Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Gothic – Morphosyntactic structures, Part 3 ... : Verbal Syntax ...
|
|
Goering, Nelson. - : Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Gothic – Morphosyntactic structures, Part 2 ... : Arguments and Valency ...
|
|
Goering, Nelson. - : Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Gothic – Morphology, Part 1 ... : Noun Stem Formation and Composition ...
|
|
Goering, Nelson. - : Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Gothic – Morphosyntactic structures, Part 1 ... : General Features ...
|
|
Goering, Nelson. - : Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Gothic – Morphosyntactic structures, Part 4 ... : Clausal Syntax ...
|
|
Goering, Nelson. - : Georg-August-Universität Göttingen,Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
The Terrible Bite of Fire: Metre, Sound Change, and Emendation in Beowulf 1122 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Early Old English Foot Structure ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The variable operation of high vowel deletion in Old English has long been a point of difficulty, both descriptively – a prehistoric form like *hēafudu is attested variably as hēafudu , hēafdu , and hēafod – and theoretically. Recent work, especially by Bermúdez‐Otero (2005b) and Fulk (2010), has indicated that plural forms like hēafudu are most likely original, but accounting for why the medial *u is preserved in this case form, and not in hēafde , the dative singular of the same word, has remained theoretically problematic. These difficulties arise from attempting to describe the prehistoric Old English process of high vowel deletion on the basis of later Old English phonology. At an earlier stage, the nominative‐accusative plural *hēafudu could be exhaustively parsed into two precisely bimoraic feet: *[hēa][.fu.du]. The dative singular historically ended with a long vowel, *hēafudǣ , in which the medial *u could not be accommodated within a bimoraic foot: *[hēa].fu[.dǣ]. High vowel deletion is therefore ...
|
|
Keyword:
Germanic philology; Old English; Phonology
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.17613/w1jx-qx47 https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:30751/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
The Fall of Arthur and The Legend of Sigurd and Gudrún : A Metrical Review of Three Modern English Alliterative Poems ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|