| 1 |
Wh-interrogatives in ancient Greek ; Wh-interrogatives in ancient Greek: Disentangling focus- and wh-movement
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0039-3193 ; EISSN: 1467-9582 ; Studia Linguistica ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03579191 ; Studia Linguistica, Wiley-Blackwell, In press (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
On the syntax of West Kalimantan: Asymmetries and A'-movement in Malayic and Land Dayak languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Head movement and allomorphy in children's negative questions
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 3 (2018): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 33:1–9 ; 2473-8689 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Echo Questions in Turkish
|
|
|
|
In: Open Access Theses & Dissertations (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Pair-list readings in Korean-Japanese, Chinese-Japanese and English-Japanese interlanguage
|
|
: Sage Publications, 2011. : Sage UK: London, England, 2011
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Pair-list readings in Korean-Japanese, Chinese-Japanese and English-Japanese interlanguage
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0267-6583 ; EISSN: 1477-0326 ; Second Language Research ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570743 ; Second Language Research, SAGE Publications, 2008, 24 (2), pp.189-226. ⟨10.1177/0267658307086301⟩ (2008)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; In English and Chinese, questions with a -object and a universally quantified subject (e.g.) allow an individual answer (Everyone bought apples.) and a pair-list answer (). By contrast, the pair-list answer is reportedly unavailable in Japanese and Korean. This article documents an experimental investigation of the interpretation of such questions in non-native Japanese by learners whose first languages (Lls) are Korean, Chinese or English. The results show that, regardless of L1, only a minority of advanced second language (L2) Japanese learners demonstrate knowledge of the absence of pair-list readings in Japanese. In English-Japanese and Chinese-Japanese interlanguage, L1 transfer readily accounts for this finding: the L1 grammar, which allows pair-list readings, may obstruct acquisition of the more restrictive Japanese grammar. But in Korean-Japanese interlanguage, L1 transfer predicts rejection of pair-list answers. However, in a Korean version of the experimental task, a native Korean control group robustly accepts pair-list readings, expectations. A proposal to account for this finding is put forward, under which the Korean-Japanese interlanguage data become compatible with an L1-transfer-based model of L2 acquisition. Moreover, the native-like rejection of pair-list readings by some advanced learners of all three L1 backgrounds is argued to imply that UG constraints operate at the L2 syntax-semantics interface.
|
|
Keyword:
Chinese; Korean; L2 Japanese; L2 poverty of the stimulus; pair-list readings; quantifier interpretation; semantics interface; syntax; wh-questions
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570743/file/PEER_stage2_10.1177%252F0267658307086301.pdf
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570743
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570743/document
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307086301
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 11 |
FUNCTIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON WH-QUESTION FORMATION 1 Sergio de Moura Menuzzi (UFRGS \ CNPq)
|
|
In: http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/1004-1208/1004-OTHERO-0-0.PDF
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
