4 |
Humans do not reason from contradictory premises. The psychological aspects of paraconsistency.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Introductory Textbooks in the Philosophy of Science: the Transformation of the Study Curriculum From 1937 to 2017
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Epistemic diversity and the question of Lingua Franca in science and philosophy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Friedrich Waismann : eine historisch-philosophische Betrachtung
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Language, Necessity and Convention: Reconsidering the Linguistic Approach to Modality ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Language, Necessity and Convention: Reconsidering the Linguistic Approach to Modality
|
|
Nyseth, Fredrik. - : University of Cambridge, 2018. : Faculty of Philosophy, 2018. : Wolfson College, 2018
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Das Verhältnis zwischen den Begriffen "Erfahrung" und "Sprache" ausgehend von Hans-Georg Gadamers Wahrheit und Methode : eine antireduktionistische Lesart gegen Relativismusvorwürfe
|
|
|
|
BLLDB
|
|
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Von der logischen Analyse der Sprache zur rationalen Rekonstruktion von Theorien : eine Untersuchung zum Problem der theoretischen Begriffe im logischen Empirismus und im Strukturalismus
|
|
|
|
BLLDB
|
|
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
What's Right With a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models?
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Syntactic approaches in the philosophy of science, which are based on formalizations in predicate logic, are often considered in principle inferior to semantic approaches, which are based on formalizations with the help of structures. To compare the two kinds of approach, I identify some ambiguities in common semantic accounts and explicate the concept of a structure in a way that avoids hidden references to a specific vocabulary. From there, I argue that contrary to common opinion (i) unintended models do not pose a significant problem for syntactic approaches to scientific theories, (ii) syntactic approaches can be at least as language independent as semantic ones, and (iii) in syntactic approaches, scientific theories can be as well connected to the world as in semantic ones. Based on these results, I argue that syntactic and semantic approaches fare equally well when it comes to (iv) ease of application, (iv) accommodating the use of models in the sciences, and (vi) capturing the theory-observation relation.
|
|
Keyword:
Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism; Models and Idealization; Structure of Theories; Theory/Observation
|
|
URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9650/ http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9650/4/lutz-whats_right_syntactic_view.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|