1 |
Addressing patients’ communication support needs through speech-language pathologist-nurse information-sharing: Employing ethnography to understand the acute stroke context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
A Systematic Review of Studies Describing the Effectiveness, Acceptability, and Potential Harms of Place-Based Interventions to Address Loneliness and Mental Health Problems
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Is Early Bilingual Experience Associated with Greater Fluid Intelligence in Adults?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Time for talk: The work of reflexivity in developing empirical understanding of speech and language therapist and nursing interaction on stroke wards
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Generic learning mechanisms can drive social inferences: The role of type frequency
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Animalizing women and feminizing men: The psychological intersections of human supremacism, sexism, and anti-veganism
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Learning from communication versus observation in great apes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
A socio-ecological perspective on the gestural communication of great ape species, individuals, and social units
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
From Beethoven to Beyoncé : do changing aesthetic cultures amount to ‘cumulative cultural evolution’?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Inferential communication : bridging the gap between intentional and ostensive communication in non-human primates
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Bo-NO-bouba-kiki : picture-word mapping but no spontaneous sound symbolic speech-shape mapping in a language trained bonobo
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The social and psychological work of metaphor: a corpus linguistic investigation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Causal and associational language in observational health research: a systematic evaluation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Is passive priming really impervious to verb semantics? a high-powered replication of Messenger Et al. (2012)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Gestational age, parent education, and education in adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Prior experience with unlabeled actions facilitates 3-year-old children's verb learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
COVID-19 first lockdown as a window into language acquisition : associations between caregiver-child activities and vocabulary gains
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
'Now I am myself’: exploring how people with post-stroke aphasia experienced Solution Focused Brief Therapy within the SOFIA Trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Start with “Why,” but only if you have to: The strategic framing of novel ideas across different audiences
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Research Summary: Building on social psychology research and entrepreneurship work on linguistic framing, we argue that the appreciation of novel ideas varies with the mental construal that members of different audiences use to evaluate them. Specifically, we theorize that the congruency between idea framing and audiences' mental construals depends on audiences' level of expertise in evaluating novel ideas. In four experiments, we found that innovators benefit from deploying framing strategies congruent with audiences' mental construals: novices (e.g., lay people, crowdfunders) appreciate more novel ideas framed in abstract why terms, while experts (e.g., professional investors, innovation managers) novel ideas framed in concrete how terms. Integrating the strategic framing of novel ideas with construal level theory and audience heterogeneity contributes to research on entrepreneurship, innovation, and impression management. Managerial Summary: One of the critical challenges that innovators (e.g., entrepreneurs) face is to persuade relevant audiences (e.g., users, crowdfunders, professional investors, and innovation managers) to support their novel ideas. This article integrates various literatures concerned with the evaluation of novelty to examine the impact of different framing strategies on the reception of novel ideas by different audiences. By demonstrating that the framing of a novel business idea affects audience members' evaluation, and that the effectiveness of different frames (why vs. how) varies with the target audiences (novices vs. experts), we offer actionable insights into how innovators can strategically use linguistic framing to increase the likelihood of eliciting favorable evaluations and resource commitment for their ideas.
|
|
Keyword:
BF Psychology; HB Economic Theory; P Philology. Linguistics
|
|
URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/26920/ https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/26920/3/SMJ_Main%20Document_FINAL.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3329
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|