2 |
Dataset for bilinguals_Bilinguals are better than monolinguals in detecting manipulative discourse.txt ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Dataset for monolinguals_Bilinguals are better than monolinguals in detecting manipulative discourse.txt ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Bilinguals are better than monolinguals in detecting manipulative discourse ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Crosslinguistic influence in L3 acquisition across linguistic modules
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Stable and vulnerable domains in Germanic heritage languages
|
|
|
|
In: Oslo Studies in Language ; 11 (2021), 2. - S. 503-526. - University of Oslo. - eISSN 1890-9639 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Bilinguals are better than monolinguals in detecting manipulative discourse
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Internal and External Factors in Heritage Language Acquisition : Evidence From Heritage Russian in Israel, Germany, Norway, Latvia and the United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
In: Frontiers in Education ; 5 (2020). - 20. - Frontiers Media. - eISSN 2504-284X (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Acceptable Ungrammatical Sentences, Unacceptable Grammatical Sentences, and the Role of the Cognitive Parser
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
raw data for monolinguals_Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired.txt ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Test items for monolinguals_Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired.pdf ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Replication Data for: Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Test items for bidialectals_Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired.pdf ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
raw data for bidialectals_Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired.txt ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
The Bottleneck Hypothesis in L2 acquisition: L1 Norwegian learners’ knowledge of syntax and morphology in L2 English
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The Bottleneck Hypothesis (Slabakova, 2008, 2013) proposes that acquiring properties of the functional morphology is the most challenging part of learning a second language. In the experiment presented here, the predictions of this hypothesis are tested in the L2 English of Norwegian native speakers. Two constructions are investigated that do not match in English and Norwegian: One involving functional morphology, Subject–Verb (SV) agreement, which is obligatory in the L2 but non-existent in the L1, and one involving syntax, Verb-Second (V2) word order, which is obligatory in the L1, but restricted to specific contexts in the L2. The results of an acceptability judgement task indicate that the participants struggled more with identifying ungrammatical SV agreement than ungrammatical word order. We conclude that the findings lend tentative support to the Bottleneck Hypothesis.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/427065/2/SLR_accepted_The_Bottleneck_Hypothesis_in_L2_acquisition.docx https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/427065/1/CLEAN_The_Bottleneck_Hypothesis_in_L2_acquisitionIJBL.docx https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/427065/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|