DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 38

1
Lexical nouns are both +mass and +count, but they are neither + mass nor +count
In: Count and mass across languages (Oxford, 2012), p. 9-26
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
2
Holism and compositionality
In: The Oxford handbook of compositionality (New York, 2012), p. 149-174
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
3
Lexical Nouns are Both +MASS and +COUNT, but They are Neither +MASS nor +COUNT ...
Pelletier, Francis J.. - : University of Alberta Libraries, 2012
BASE
Show details
4
Lexical Nouns are Both +MASS and +COUNT, but They are Neither +MASS nor +COUNT
BASE
Show details
5
Lexical Nouns are Both +MASS and +COUNT, but They are Neither +MASS nor +COUNT
Pelletier, Francis J.. - : University of Alberta, 2012
BASE
Show details
6
Meaning and Ontology
BASE
Show details
7
Generics: A Philosophical Introduction
BASE
Show details
8
Generics: A Philosophical Introduction
Pelletier, Francis J.. - : University of Alberta, 2010
BASE
Show details
9
Compositional Belief Update
BASE
Show details
10
Content, Context and Composition
BASE
Show details
11
Content, Context and Composition
Pagin, Peter; Pelletier, Francis J.. - : University of Alberta, 2007
BASE
Show details
12
On a homework problem of Larry Horn's
In: Drawing the boundaries of meaning (Amsterdam, 2006), p. 281-294
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
13
[Review of the book Foundations of Intensional Semantics, by Cox, & Sappin]
Abstract: Intensional logic (IL) and its application to natural language, which the present monograph addresses, was first developed by Richard Montague in the late 1960s (e.g., Montague 1970a, 1970b). Through the efforts of (especially) Barbara Partee (e.g., Partee 1975, 1976), and Richmond Thomason, who edited the posthumous collection of Montague’s works (Thomason 1974), this became the main framework for those who aspired to a formal semantic theory for natural language, and these included computational linguists as early as Jerry Hobbs in the late 1970s (e.g., Hobbs and Rosenschein 1977). In fact, until the advent of the current interest in statistical linguistics with its own conception of what semantics is, IL, or some variant of it, was perhaps the main theory of semantics within computational linguistics generally. And within current computational semantics it still is.
Keyword: Book Reviews; Computational Semantics; Intensional Logic; Natural Language
URL: https://doi.org/10.7939/R30G3HC6V
https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/0a6f20b1-6507-4f9e-8630-179eecd023d1
BASE
Hide details
14
[Review of the book Representation and Inference for Natural Language: A First Course in Computational Semantics, by Plackburn, & Jos]
BASE
Show details
15
The principle of semantic compositionality
In: Semantics. A reader (2004), 133-156
IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik
Show details
16
[Review of the book The Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, by Pájek]
Pelletier, Francis J.. - : University of Alberta, 2000
BASE
Show details
17
[Review of the book The Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, by Pájek]
BASE
Show details
18
Thinking of 'not'
In: Discourse, interaction and communication on Cognitive Science (ICCS-95) (Dordrecht, 1998), p. 37-48
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
19
Discourse, interaction and communication on Cognitive Science (ICCS-95)
Arrazola, Xabier; Korta, Kepa; Pelletier, Francis J.. - Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1998
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
20
[Review of the book Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification, by Kan Deemter, & Seters]
Pelletier, Francis J.. - : University of Alberta, 1998
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
13
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
24
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern