1 |
Asymmetric Morphological Priming Among Inflected and Derived Verbs and Nouns in Greek
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Neural Networks Supporting Phoneme Monitoring Are Modulated by Phonology but Not Lexicality or Iconicity: Evidence From British and Swedish Sign Language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Neural Networks Supporting Phoneme Monitoring Are Modulated by Phonology but Not Lexicality or Iconicity: Evidence From British and Swedish Sign Language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Preexisting semantic representation improves working memory performance in the visuospatial domain
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Monitoring different phonological parameters of sign language engages the same cortical language network but distinctive perceptual ones
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Differential activity in Heschl's gyrus between deaf and hearing individuals is due to auditory deprivation rather than language modality
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Sensory cortices undergo crossmodal reorganisation as a consequence of sensory deprivation. Congenital deafness in humans represents a particular case with respect to other types of sensory deprivation, because cortical reorganisation is not only a consequence of auditory deprivation, but also of language-driven mechanisms. Visual crossmodal plasticity has been found in secondary auditory cortices of deaf individuals, but it is still unclear if reorganisation also takes place in primary auditory areas, and how this relates to language modality and auditory deprivation. Here, we dissociated the effects of language modality and auditory deprivation on crossmodal plasticity in Heschl's gyrus as a whole, and in cytoarchitectonic region Te1.0 (likely to contain the core auditory cortex). Using fMRI, we measured the BOLD response to viewing sign language in congenitally or early deaf individuals with and without sign language knowledge, and in hearing controls. Results show that differences between hearing and deaf individuals are due to a reduction in activation caused by visual stimulation in the hearing group, which is more significant in Te1.0 than in Heschl's gyrus as a whole. Furthermore, differences between deaf and hearing groups are due to auditory deprivation, and there is no evidence that the modality of language used by deaf individuals contributes to crossmodal plasticity in Heschl's gyrus.
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.073 https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/61424/ https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/61424/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
Collecting and Analyzing Sign Language Data: Video Requirements and Use of Annotation Software
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Similar digit-based working memory in deaf signers and hearing non-signers despite digit span differences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Dissociating cognitive and sensory neural plasticity in human superior temporal cortex
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Similar digit-based working memory in deaf signers and hearing non-signers despite digit span differences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from sensitivity to grammaticality judgement in British Sign Language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|