| 1 |
An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Sci (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Assessing Parent Behaviours in Parent–Child Interactions with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Infants Aged 0–3 Years: A Systematic Review
|
|
|
|
In: J Clin Med (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Assessing Parent-Child Interaction in Infant Deafness
|
|
|
|
In: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists.
|
|
|
|
In: Ali, Myzoon Soroli, Efstathia Jesus, Luis M. T. Cruice, Madeline Isaksen, Jytte Visch-Brink, Evy Grohmann, Kleanthes K. Jagoe, C. Kukkonen, Tarja Varlokosta, Spyridoula Hernández Sacristán, Carlos Rosell Clari, Vicent Palmer, Rebecca Martinez Ferreiro, Silvia Godecke, Erin Wallace, Sarah J. McMenamin, Ruth Copland, David Breitenstein, Caterina Bowen, Audrey Laska, Ann-Charlotte Hilari, Katerina Brady, Marian C. 2021 An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists. Aphasiology 1 21 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Background : Definitions reflect the current state of knowledge about a health condition. An agreed definition of aphasia is central to the progression of the science and clinical practice relevant to aphasia.Aim : To establish consensus on a definition of aphasia.Methods & Procedures : A three-round modified e-Delphi study was conducted with aphasia researchers who were members of the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (CATs). In round one, participants were provided with a draft definition developed by the Societal Impact and Reintegration Working Group of CATs. Participants were asked whether they agreed with the definition and were asked to comment on any aspects that they perceived to require amendment. Comments were collated and analysed using inductive content analysis. In round two, participants were presented with the collated and de-identified results of the first round and the participants were asked to vote “yes/no” on two contentious aspects of the definition. In round three, agreement on the revised definition was again sought using closed “yes/no” voting. Consensus was defined a priori as at least 70% agreement by 80% of all CATs members. CATs membership fluctuated across the study period and ranged between 131 and 141 members.Outcomes & Results : The proposed definition was Aphasia is a communication disability due to an acquired impairment of language modalities caused by focal brain damage. Aphasia may affect participation and quality of life of the person with aphasia as well as their family and friends. Aphasia masks competence and affects functioning across relationships, life roles and activities, thereby influencing social inclusion, social connectedness, access to information and services, equal rights, and wellbeing in family, community and culture.Two main categories of proposed amendments to the definition were identified: (1) definition of aphasia as a communication disability versus a language impairment; and (2) definition of aphasia as being the result of a focal and/or diffuse lesion. After three rounds of surveys, consensus was unable to be achieved with an almost even split across participants on both amendment issues.Conclusion : Further debate about the use of the term communication disability to describe aphasia and whether aphasia is a result of focal or diffuse lesions is required before consensus is again attempted.
|
|
Keyword:
1203 Language and Linguistics; 2728 Clinical Neurology; 2733 Otorhinolaryngology; 2808 Neurology; 2912 LPN and LVN; 3204 Developmental and Educational Psychology; 3310 Linguistics and Language; Clinical Neurology; Developmental and Educational Psychology; Language and Linguistics; Linguistics and Language; LPN and LVN; Neurology; Otorhinolaryngology
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:d2586fa
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Technology‐enhanced reading therapy for people with aphasia: findings from a quasi‐randomized waitlist controlled study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: results of a quasi-randomized waitlist controlled study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Reporting interventions in communication partner training: a critical review and narrative synthesis of the literature
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
