3 |
Zero-Shot Dependency Parsing with Worst-Case Aware Automated Curriculum Learning ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Parsing with Pretrained Language Models, Multiple Datasets, and Dataset Embeddings ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
A Multilingual Benchmark for Probing Negation-Awareness with Minimal Pairs ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
On Language Models for Creoles ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Creole languages such as Nigerian Pidgin English and Haitian Creole are under-resourced and largely ignored in the NLP literature. Creoles typically result from the fusion of a foreign language with multiple local languages, and what grammatical and lexical features are transferred to the creole is a complex process. While creoles are generally stable, the prominence of some features may be much stronger with certain demographics or in some linguistic situations. This paper makes several contributions: We collect existing corpora and release models for Haitian Creole, Nigerian Pidgin English, and Singaporean Colloquial English. We evaluate these models on intrinsic and extrinsic tasks. Motivated by the above literature, we compare standard language models with distributionally robust ones and find that, somewhat surprisingly, the standard language models are superior to the distributionally robust ones. We investigate whether this is an effect of over-parameterization or relative distributional stability, ... : CoNLL 2021 ...
|
|
Keyword:
Computation and Language cs.CL; FOS Computer and information sciences
|
|
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06074 https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2109.06074
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
7 |
What Should/Do/Can LSTMs Learn When Parsing Auxiliary Verb Constructions? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Køpsala: Transition-Based Graph Parsing via Efficient Training and Effective Encoding ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Comparison by Conversion: Reverse-Engineering UCCA from Syntax and Lexical Semantics ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Representation and parsing of multiword expressions: Current trends
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|