1 |
An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Sci (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Assessing Parent Behaviours in Parent–Child Interactions with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Infants Aged 0–3 Years: A Systematic Review
|
|
|
|
In: J Clin Med (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Assessing Parent-Child Interaction in Infant Deafness
|
|
|
|
In: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2021)
|
|
Abstract:
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the importance of parent-child interaction (PCI) in infant deafness and address the lack of robust assessment tools in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Most deaf babies are born to hearing parents with little experience in deafness. Deafness can reduce access to spoken language. Despite advancements in amplification technology, deaf children still present with delays in attention and communication skills at the start of nursery. Research reports that hearing parents of deaf infants can be more directive during interaction, spend less time following the child’s focus of attention, and have more difficulty achieving successful turn-taking in conversation. Much research tells us that these factors impact on the quality and quantity of PCI. Good PCI, in all infants, but especially so in deafness, is a strong predictor of child language outcomes. Teachers of the Deaf and Speech and Language Therapists are the first professionals to support families in the home. For these professionals, having an objective way of assessing PCI would greatly assist and standardise their practice. However, to date, there are no deaf-specific assessments to observe and appraise a parent’s communication behaviours when interacting with their deaf child. SUMMARY: Intervention studies with families of deaf children have shown success in improving parental sensitivity and facilitative language techniques. An observational assessment in parent-deaf child interaction would ensure that communication interventions are appropriately targeted on the individual family’s needs.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33797421 https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000710 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610700/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
13 |
An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists.
|
|
|
|
In: Ali, Myzoon Soroli, Efstathia Jesus, Luis M. T. Cruice, Madeline Isaksen, Jytte Visch-Brink, Evy Grohmann, Kleanthes K. Jagoe, C. Kukkonen, Tarja Varlokosta, Spyridoula Hernández Sacristán, Carlos Rosell Clari, Vicent Palmer, Rebecca Martinez Ferreiro, Silvia Godecke, Erin Wallace, Sarah J. McMenamin, Ruth Copland, David Breitenstein, Caterina Bowen, Audrey Laska, Ann-Charlotte Hilari, Katerina Brady, Marian C. 2021 An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists. Aphasiology 1 21 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Technology‐enhanced reading therapy for people with aphasia: findings from a quasi‐randomized waitlist controlled study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: results of a quasi-randomized waitlist controlled study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Reporting interventions in communication partner training: a critical review and narrative synthesis of the literature
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|