1 |
Bilingualism and Aging: Implications for (Delaying) Neurocognitive Decline
|
|
|
|
In: Front Hum Neurosci (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Gender attraction in sentence comprehension
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 6, No 1 (2021); 20 ; 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Bilingualism is a long-term cognitively challenging experience that modulates metabolite concentrations in the healthy brain
|
|
|
|
In: Scientific Reports ; 11 (2021). - 7090. - Springer Nature. - eISSN 2045-2322 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Determinants of bilingualism predict dynamic changes in resting state EEG oscillations
|
|
|
|
In: Brain and Language ; 223 (2021). - 105030. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0093-934X. - eISSN 1090-2155 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
On the status of transfer in adult third language acquisition of early bilinguals
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Parsing preferences and individual differences in non-native sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
What Have We Learned About Bilingualism? Regarding Nichols et al. (2020)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The cognitive and neurological effects of bilingualism on healthy ageing and the progression of dementia: a longitudinal study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Event related potentials at initial exposure in third language acquisition : Implications from an artificial mini-grammar study
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Neurolinguistics ; 56 (2020). - 100939. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0911-6044. - eISSN 1873-8052 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Low proficiency does not mean ab initio: A methodological footnote for linguistic transfer studies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Terminology Matters On Theoretical Grounds Too! : Coherent Grammars Cannot Be Incomplete
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Second Language Acquisition ; 41 (2019), 2. - S. 257-264. - ISSN 0272-2631. - eISSN 1470-1545 (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
Herein, we provide counterargumentation to some of Domínguez, Hicks, and Slabakova's claims that the term incomplete acquisition is conceptually necessary on theoretical grounds for describing the outcome grammars of heritage language bilingualism. Specifically, we clarify their claim that previous challenging of the term in our and others’ work is primarily based on a misconceived belief that incompleteness is intended to describe heritage speakers. We contextualize and problematize their appropriation of descriptive constructs in the adjacent fields of child L1, child 2L1, and adult L2 acquisition as a basis for supporting their general thesis. Relatedly, we conclude that a fundamental blurring of development and ultimate attainment issues is at the core of what, in our view, is flawed reasoning. While we empathize with the well-intentioned spirit of Domínguez et al.’s article—to provide a forum for respectful discussion—we invite the field to engage more directly with the inherent quandary of labeling the coherent grammars of heritage bilinguals in their own right as “incomplete” on the basis of differences to standard varieties. ; published
|
|
Keyword:
ddc:400
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000287 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-10lb5n3keqy5v1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|