DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 7 of 7

1
Speakers Use More Informative Referring Expressions to Describe Surprising Events
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Speakers Use More Informative Referring Expressions to Describe Surprising Events ...
BASE
Show details
3
Structural Asymmetry in Question/Quantifier Interactions
In: Linguistic and cognitive aspects of quantification (2018), S. 13-29
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
4
Resolving wh-/quantifier ambiguities ...
Achimova, Asya. - : No Publisher Supplied, 2014
BASE
Show details
5
Which account of wh-/quantifier interaction should everyone adopt? A new take on a classic developmental puzzle
In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development ; 37th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00932545 ; 37th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Nov 2012, Boston, United States. pp.1-12 (2012)
BASE
Show details
6
Resolving Wh/quantifier ambiguities: a psycholinguitic [sic] approach
Achimova, Asya. - 2011
Abstract: The interaction of wh-words and quantifiers in questions has long been characterized as exhibiting a subject/object asymmetry, when a pair-list answer is available for object questions with subject quantifiers, like Which book did every student read? but not for subject questions with object quantifiers Which student read every book? (May 1985). Yet, the availability of pair-list answers to subject questions remains debatable and individual acceptability judgments reported in the literature vary significantly. We ran three experiments to test what factors proposed in the syntactic/semantic literature contribute to the availability of pair-list answers. The experiments confirmed the subject/object asymmetry. The data show that plurality of a wh-phrase does not make pair-list answers more readily available; pair-list answers are more likely to arise for questions with each than with every. We have also uncovered a group of individuals whose acceptability of pair-list answers is high both for subject and object questions and therefore does not show a subject/object asymmetry. We make an attempt to account for the behavior of that group by extending the analysis proposed in Beghelli (1997). ; M.S. ; Includes bibliographical references ; by Asya Achimova
Keyword: Comparative and general--Quantifiers; Grammar; Psycholinguistics; Psychology; Subjectivity (Linguistics)
URL: http://hdl.rutgers.edu/1782.1/rucore10001600001.ETD.000057501
BASE
Hide details
7
What makes pair list answers available: An experimental approach
In: NELS 41 Proceedings ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00929986 ; NELS 41 Proceedings, Oct 2010, University of Pennsylvania, United States (2010)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
6
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern