1 |
RELEVANCE THEORY
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2011-Russell.pdf (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Metaphor and the Literal/Nonliteral Distinction
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2011-Allan-Jaszczolt.pdf (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Relevance Theory: Contextualism or Pragmaticism?
|
|
|
|
In: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/publications/wpl/09papers/carston/ (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Explicit Communication and ‘Free’ Pragmatic Enrichment
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2010-Soria.pdf (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Optional pragmatic processes or optional covert linguistic structure?
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk/linguistics/publications/WPL/08papers/Carston%20final.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Metaphor and the 'Emergent Property' Problem: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. The Baltic
|
|
|
|
In: http://thebalticyearbook.org/journals/baltic/article/viewFile/23/22/ (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Relevance theory - new directions and developments
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/publications/WPL/05papers/carston_powell.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and $
|
|
|
|
In: http://sws1.bu.edu/bfraser/EDM Papers/Blakemore - The Pragmatics of Sentential Coord. with And.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/cogpragsarchit.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning -- more questions than answers
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/02papers/carston.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The relationship between generative grammar and (relevancetheoretic) pragmatics
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/grammarprags.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Negation, 'Presupposition' and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/negationsemprag.pdf (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Pragmatics and the Explicit–Implicit Distinction
|
|
|
|
In: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2009-Cummings-Encyclop.pdf (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The Semantics/pragmatics Distinction: A View From Relevance Theory
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~jamesp/classes/cs216/Carston-RelevanceTheory.pdf (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistische Berichte 8
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/enrichloose.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/papers/carston.ps (1996)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/96papers/carston.pdf (1996)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Metalinguistic Negation And Echoic Use
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/metanegechoic.pdf (1996)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Metalinguistic negation and echoic use
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk/linguistics/publications/WPL/94papers/CARSTON.pdf (1994)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
2010: Metaphor: ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. of the Aristotelian
|
|
|
|
In: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2010-Aristotelian.pdf (1978)
|
|
Abstract:
I propose that an account of metaphor understanding which covers the full range of cases has to allow for two routes or modes of processing. One is a process of rapid, local, on-line concept construction that applies quite generally to the recovery of word meaning in utterance comprehension. The other requires a greater focus on the literal meaning of sentences or texts, which is metarepresented as a whole and subjected to more global, reflective pragmatic inference. The questions whether metaphors convey a propositional content and what role imagistic representation plays receive somewhat different answers depending on the processing route. I Introduction. Here are some examples of language use which are generally agreed to be metaphorical: 1 (1) My lawyer is a shark. (2) The river sweated oil and tar. (3) Love is the lighthouse and the rescued mariners. (Oskar
|
|
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.401.66
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|