1 |
RELEVANCE THEORY
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2011-Russell.pdf (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Metaphor and the Literal/Nonliteral Distinction
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2011-Allan-Jaszczolt.pdf (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Relevance Theory: Contextualism or Pragmaticism?
|
|
|
|
In: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/publications/wpl/09papers/carston/ (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Explicit Communication and ‘Free’ Pragmatic Enrichment
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2010-Soria.pdf (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Optional pragmatic processes or optional covert linguistic structure?
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk/linguistics/publications/WPL/08papers/Carston%20final.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Metaphor and the 'Emergent Property' Problem: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. The Baltic
|
|
|
|
In: http://thebalticyearbook.org/journals/baltic/article/viewFile/23/22/ (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Relevance theory - new directions and developments
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/publications/WPL/05papers/carston_powell.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and $
|
|
|
|
In: http://sws1.bu.edu/bfraser/EDM Papers/Blakemore - The Pragmatics of Sentential Coord. with And.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/cogpragsarchit.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning -- more questions than answers
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/02papers/carston.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The relationship between generative grammar and (relevancetheoretic) pragmatics
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/grammarprags.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Negation, 'Presupposition' and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/negationsemprag.pdf (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Pragmatics and the Explicit–Implicit Distinction
|
|
|
|
In: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2009-Cummings-Encyclop.pdf (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The Semantics/pragmatics Distinction: A View From Relevance Theory
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~jamesp/classes/cs216/Carston-RelevanceTheory.pdf (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistische Berichte 8
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/enrichloose.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/papers/carston.ps (1996)
|
|
Abstract:
Within relevance theory the two local pragmatic processes of enrichment and loosening of linguistically encoded conceptual material have been given quite distinct treatments. Enrichments of various sorts, including those which involve a logical strengthening of a lexical concept, contribute to the proposition expressed by the utterance, hence to its truthconditions. Loosenings, including metaphorical uses, do not enter into the proposition expressed by the utterance or affect its truth-conditions; they stand in a relation of 'interpretive resemblance' with the linguistically encoded concept used to represent them. This asymmetric treatment is questioned here, arguments are given for an account which reflects the complementarity of these processes and several alternative symmetrical treatments are explored. 1 Introduction One important consequence of the relevance-theoretic view of cognition and communication is the following: we can think many thoughts that our language cannot encode,.
|
|
URL: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/papers/carston.ps http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.57.2174
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/96papers/carston.pdf (1996)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Metalinguistic Negation And Echoic Use
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/metanegechoic.pdf (1996)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Metalinguistic negation and echoic use
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.langsci.ucl.ac.uk/linguistics/publications/WPL/94papers/CARSTON.pdf (1994)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
2010: Metaphor: ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. of the Aristotelian
|
|
|
|
In: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/linguistics/People/linguistics-staff/robyn_carston/pdfs/Carston-2010-Aristotelian.pdf (1978)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|