1 |
Sentence Comprehension Deficits of Specific Language Impairment (Montgomery et al., 2016) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Sentence Comprehension Deficits of Specific Language Impairment (Montgomery et al., 2016) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Neural patterns elicited by lexical processing in adolescents with specific language impairment: support for the procedural deficit hypothesis?
|
|
|
|
In: J Neurodev Disord (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Cognitive Processes Related to Memory Capacity Explain Nearly All of the Variance in Language Test Performance in School-Age Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
A New Memory Perspective on the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Theory, Assessment, and Intervention
|
|
|
|
In: Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Consistency of a Nonword Repetition Task to Discriminate Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder in Catalan–Spanish and European Portuguese Speaking Children
|
|
|
|
In: Children (Basel) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Consistency of a nonword repetition task to discriminate children with and without developmental language disorder in Catalan-Spanish and European Portuguese speaking children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Consistency of a Nonword Repetition Task to Discriminate Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder in Catalan-Spanish and European Portuguese Speaking Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Statistical word learning in Catalan-Spanish and English-speaking children with and without developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Consistency of a nonword repetition task to discriminate children with and without developmental language disorder in catalan-spanish and european portuguese speaking children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Verbal working memory capacity in DLD (Montgomery et al., 2019) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Verbal working memory capacity in DLD (Montgomery et al., 2019) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Cognitive Predictors of Sentence Comprehension in Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Assessment and Treatment
|
|
|
|
In: Int J Speech Lang Pathol (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
A Comparison of the Storage-Only Deficit and Joint Mechanism Deficit Hypotheses of the Verbal Working Memory Storage Capacity Limitation of Children With Developmental Language Disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Word Frequency Is Associated With Cognitive Effort During Verbal Working Memory: A Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A Comparison of the Storage-Only Deficit and Joint Mechanism Deficit Hypotheses of the Verbal Working Memory Storage Capacity Limitation of Children with Developmental Language Disorder
|
|
|
|
In: Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education Faculty Publications (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
Purpose: The storage-only deficit and joint mechanism deficit hypotheses are two possible explanations of the verbal working memory (vWM) storage capacity limitation of school-age children with developmental language disorder (DLD). We assessed the merits of each hypothesis in a large group of children with DLD and a group of same-age typically developing (TD) children. Method: Participants were 117 children with DLD and 117 propensity-matched TD children 7-11 years of age. Children completed tasks indexing vWM capacity, verbal short-term storage, sustained attention, attention switching, and lexical long-term memory (LTM). Results: For the DLD group, all of the mechanisms jointly explained 26.5% of total variance. Storage accounted for the greatest portion (13.7%), followed by controlled attention (primarily sustained attention 6.5%), and then lexical LTM (5.6%). For the TD group, all three mechanisms together explained 43.9% of total variance. Storage accounted for the most variance (19.6%), followed by lexical LTM (16.0%), sustained attention (5.4%), and attention switching (3.0%). There was a significant LTM by Group interaction in which stronger LTM scores were associated with significantly higher vWM capacity scores for the TD group as compared to the DLD group. Conclusions: Results support a joint mechanism deficit account of the vWM capacity limitation of children with DLD. Results provide substantively new insights into the underlying factors of the vWM capacity limitation in DLD.
|
|
Keyword:
Communication Sciences and Disorders; controlled attention; developmental language disorder; Speech Pathology and Audiology; working memory
|
|
URL: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/comd_facpub/511 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1510&context=comd_facpub
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Cognitive processing and comprehension in developmental language disorder (Montgomery et al., 2018) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Cognitive processing and comprehension in developmental language disorder (Montgomery et al., 2018) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Lexical leverage: category knowledge boosts real-time novel word recognition in 2-year-olds.
|
|
|
|
In: Developmental science, vol 19, iss 6 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Semantic structure in vocabulary knowledge interacts with lexical and sentence processing in infancy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|