2 |
Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Towards a complete model of reading: Simulating lexical decision, word naming, and sentence reading with Über-Reader
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
What is the most plausible account of the role of parafoveal processing in reading?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
How does foveal processing difficulty affect parafoveal processing during reading?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Beyond cloze probability: Parafoveal processing of semantic and syntactic information during reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Recent evidence from studies using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm suggests that parafoveal preview benefit is contingent on the fit between a preview word and the sentence context. We investigated whether this plausibility preview benefit is modulated by preview/target orthographic relatedness. Participants’ eye movements were recorded as they read sentences in which the parafoveal preview of a target word was manipulated. Non-identical previews were plausible or implausible continuations of the sentence that were either an orthographic neighbor of the target or unrelated to the target. First-pass reading measures showed a strong plausibility preview benefit. There was also a benefit from preview/target orthographic relatedness across reading measures. These two preview effects did not interact on any fixation measure. There was also no evidence that the relatedness effect was caused by misperception of an orthographically similar preview as the target word. These data highlight the existence of two independent mechanisms underlying preview effects: a benefit from the contextual fit of the preview word in the sentence and a benefit from the sublexical overlap between the preview and target word. ; Australian Research Council
|
|
Keyword:
Eye movements; FoR::170112 - Sensory Processes; FoR::170204 - Linguistic Processes (incl. Speech Production and Comprehension); Perception and Performance; Reading
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8 http://hdl.handle.net/2123/19998
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Semantic preview benefit in English: Individual differences in the extraction and use of parafoveal semantic information
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Non-Decision Time Effects in the Lexical Decision Task
|
|
|
|
In: Andrews, Sally; Brown, Scott; Donkin, Christopher; & Heathcote, Andrew. (2009). Non-Decision Time Effects in the Lexical Decision Task. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 31(31). Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/07q9n3tq (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|