5 |
Morphology in Lexical-Functional Grammar and Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Marie Curie Actions TAMEAL IRSES Deliverable D 2.2 - Second collection of TAMEAL papers
|
|
|
|
In: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01428693 ; 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Marie Curie Actions TAMEAL IRSES Deliverable D 3.2 - Third collection of TAMEAL papers
|
|
|
|
In: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01428692 ; 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Possessor dissension: agreement mismatch in Ngumpin-Yapa possessive constructions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The alignment of prosody and clausal structure in Dalabon
|
|
|
|
In: Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 36, no. 1 (2016), pp. 1-27 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Australia Loves Language Puzzles: The Australian Computational and Linguistics Olympiad (OzCLO)
|
|
|
|
In: Language and Linguistics Compass (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The languages of Australia in linguistic research: context and issues
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Valency mismatches and the coding of reciprocity in Australian languages
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistic Typology (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The Languages and Linguistics of Australia
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.degruyter.com/view/product/181330 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Australia Loves Language Puzzles: The Australian Computational and Linguistics Olympiad (OzCLO)
|
|
|
|
In: Language and Linguistics Compass (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
The Languages and Linguistics of Australia
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.degruyter.com/view/product/181330 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
The languages of Australia in linguistic research: context and issues
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Valency mismatches and the coding of reciprocity in Australian languages
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistic Typology (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
Reciprocals are characterized by a crossover of thematic roles within a single clause. Their peculiar semantics often creates special argument configurations not found in other clause types. While some languages either encode reciprocals by clearly divalent, transitive clauses, or clearly monovalent, intransitive clauses, others adopt a more ambivalent solution. We develop a typology of valency/transitivity mismatches in reciprocal constructions, based on a sample of Australian languages. These include: (i) monovalent clauses with a single ergative NP, (ii) mismatches between case marking and the apparent number of arguments, (iii) ergative marking on secondary predicates and instrumentals with an intransitive subject, and (iv) complex clause constructions sensitive to valency. Such mismatches, we argue, result from an "overlay problem": both divalent and monovalent predicates in the semantic representation of prototypical reciprocal scenes have had a hand in shaping the morphosyntax of reciprocal constructions.
|
|
Keyword:
Australian languages; Keywords: Argument structure; Middle; Reciprocal; Reflexive; Transitivity; Valency
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/27666
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Acquiring a polysynthetic Australian language: From infancy to school
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Getting in Touch: Language and Digital Inclusion in Australian Indigenous Communities
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|