| 1 |
Why Don’t Languages Grammaticalize [±poisonous]?
|
|
|
|
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 14, Iss SI (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Spell-out and its consequences on the PF branch
|
|
|
|
In: The Cambridge Handbook of Minimalism ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03091781 ; Kleanthes Grohmann; Evelina Leivada. The Cambridge Handbook of Minimalism, Cambridge University Press, In press (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
What’s in (a) Label? Neural Origins and Behavioral Manifestations of Identity Avoidance in Language and Cognition
|
|
|
|
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 11, Iss SI (2017) (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
What’s in (a) Label? Neural Origins and Behavioral Manifestations of Identity Avoidance in Language and Cognition
|
|
|
|
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 11, Iss SI, Pp 221-250 (2017) (2017)
|
|
Abstract:
The present work defends the idea that grammatical categories are not in- trinsic to mergeable items, taking as a departure point Lenneberg’s (1967, 1975) claim that syntactic objects are definable only contextually. It is ar- gued that there are four different strands of inquiry that are of interest when one seeks to build an evolutionarily plausible theory of labels and operation Label: (i) linguistic constraints on adjacent elements of the same type such as Repetition/Identity Avoidance ([*XX]), (ii) data that flout these constraints ([XX]), (iii) disorders that raise questions as to whether the locus of impairment is a categorial feature per se, and (iv) operation Label as a candidate for human uniqueness. After discussing categorial identity through these perspectives, this work first traces the origins and manifesta-tions of Identity Avoidance in language and other domains of human cog-nition, with emphasis on attention orienting. Second, it pro- poses a new processing principle, the Novel Information Bias, that (i) cap- tures linguistic Identity Avoidance based on how the brain decodes types and tokens and (ii) explains the universal fact that generally the existence of adjacent occur-rences of syntactically and/or phonologically identical tokens is severely constrained.
|
|
Keyword:
attention; categories; Label; Language and Literature; P; P1-1091; Philology. Linguistics; repetition avoidance/blindness
|
|
URL: https://doaj.org/article/cfc893b0de554a658b298bef87b8a054
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 5 |
X-within-X Structures and the Nature of Categories
|
|
|
|
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 9, Iss 0, Pp 050-073 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
From Comparative Languistics to Comparative (Bio)linguistics: Reflections on Variation
|
|
|
|
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 8, Iss 0, Pp 053-066 (2014) (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Lights and Shadows in the Evolution of Language
|
|
|
|
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 168-175 (2012) (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Lights and Shadows in the Evolution of
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~jim/om.og.revu.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
From Comparative Languistics to Comparative (Bio)linguistics: Reflections on Variation
|
|
|
|
In: http://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/download/329/320/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
