| 1 |
Young learners’ processing of multimodal input and its impact on reading comprehension: an eye-tracking study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Research into recurrent, highly conventionalized “formulaic” sequences has shown a processing advantage compared to “novel” (non-formulaic) language. Studies of individual types of formulaic sequence often acknowledge the contribution of specific factors, but little work exists to compare the processing of different types of phrases with fundamentally different properties. We use eye-tracking to compare the processing of three types of formulaic phrases—idioms, binomials, and collocations—and consider whether overall frequency can explain the advantage for all three, relative to control phrases. Results show an advantage, as evidenced through shorter reading times, for all three types. While overall phrase frequency contributes much of the processing advantage, different types of phrase do show additional effects according to the specific properties that are relevant to each type: frequency, familiarity, and decomposability for idioms; predictability and semantic association for binomials; and mutual ...
|
|
Keyword:
200199 Communication and Media Studies not elsewhere classified; 200399 Language Studies not elsewhere classified; Education; FOS Languages and literature; FOS Media and communications; FOS Sociology; Sociology
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.4383419.v1
https://sage.figshare.com/collections/Is_All_Formulaic_Language_Created_Equal_Unpacking_the_Processing_Advantage_for_Different_Types_of_Formulaic_Sequences/4383419/1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Carrol-and-Conklin-SUPPLEMENTARY-MATERIALS – Supplemental material for Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Carrol-and-Conklin-SUPPLEMENTARY-MATERIALS – Supplemental material for Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Literary stylistics, authorial intention and the scientific study of literature: a critical overview
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Consumer behaviour and ICSS: exploring how consumers respond to Information, Connection and Signposting Services
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Cross language priming extends to formulaic units: evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea “has legs”
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Found in translation: the influence of the L1 on the reading of idioms in a L2
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
The role of verbal and pictorial information in multimodal incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Processing punctuation and word changes in different editions of prose fiction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Making sense of the Sense Model: translation priming with Japanese-English bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Eye-tracking multi-word units: some methodological questions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
The impact of Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) on reading by nonnative speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
