1 |
A Chimpanzee’s (Pan troglodytes) Perception of Variations in Speech: Identification of Familiar Words when Whispered and When Spoken by a Variety of Talkers
|
|
|
|
In: Heimbauer, Lisa A; Beran, Michael J; & Owren, Michael J. (2018). A Chimpanzee’s (Pan troglodytes) Perception of Variations in Speech: Identification of Familiar Words when Whispered and When Spoken by a Variety of Talkers. International Journal of Comparative Psychology. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/01t81345 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
A Longitudinal Assessment of Vocabulary Retention in Symbol-Competent Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
|
|
|
|
In: Language Research Center (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
A Longitudinal Assessment of Vocabulary Retention in Symbol-Competent Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Fading Perceptual Resemblance: A Path for Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) to Conceptual Matching?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Implicit and Explicit Category Learning by Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show the isolation effect during serial list recognition memory tests
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
A Chimpanzee Recognizes Synthetic Speech With Significantly Reduced Acoustic Cues to Phonetic Content
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Use of Exclusion by a Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) During Speech Perception and Auditory-Visual Matching-to-Sample
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
What Meaning Means for Same and Different: Analogical Reasoning in Humans (Homo sapiens), Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Thus far, language- and token-trained apes (e.g., D. Premack, 1976; R. K. R. Thompson, D. L. Oden, & S. T. Boysen, 1997) have provided the best evidence that nonhuman animals can solve, complete, and construct analogies, thus implicating symbolic representation as the mechanism enabling the phenomenon. In this study, the authors examined the role of stimulus meaning in the analogical reasoning abilities of three different primate species. Humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) completed the same relational matching-to-sample (RMTS) tasks with both meaningful and nonmeaningful stimuli. This discrimination of relations-between-relations serves as the basis for analogical reasoning. Meaningfulness facilitated the acquisition of analogical matching for human participants, whereas individual differences among the chimpanzees suggest that meaning can either enable or hinder their ability to complete analogies. Rhesus monkeys did not succeed in the RMTS task regardless of stimulus meaning, suggesting that their ability to reason analogically, if present at all, may be dependent on a dimension other than the representational value of stimuli.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.176 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18489233
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|