1 |
Why Don’t Languages Grammaticalize [±poisonous]?
|
|
|
|
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020): Special Issue—Biolinguistic Research in the 21st Century; 51-58 ; 1450-3417 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Bilinguals are better than monolinguals in detecting manipulative discourse
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Reconciling linguistic theories on comparative variation with an evolutionarily plausible language faculty ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Reconciling linguistic theories on comparative variation with an evolutionarily plausible language faculty ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Acceptable Ungrammatical Sentences, Unacceptable Grammatical Sentences, and the Role of the Cognitive Parser
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Universal linguistic hierarchies are not innately wired. Evidence from multiple adjectives
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Eliciting Big Data From Small, Young, or Non-standard Languages: 10 Experimental Challenges
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
What’s in (a) Label? Neural Origins and Behavioral Manifestations of Identity Avoidance in Language and Cognition
|
|
|
|
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 11 (2017): Special Issue—50 Years Later: A Tribute to Eric Lenneberg’s Biological Foundations of Language; 221-250 ; 1450-3417 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Functionally Equivalent Variants in a Non-standard Variety and Their Implications for Universal Grammar: A Spontaneous Speech Corpus
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The Influence of Bilectalism and Non-standardization on the Perception of Native Grammatical Variants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
X-within-X Structures and the Nature of Categories
|
|
|
|
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 9 (2015); 050-073 ; 1450-3417 (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
This paper discusses the existence of X-within-X structures in language. Constraints to same-category embedding have been the focus in a number of recent studies. These studies follow a long-standing tradition in linguistic theory that assumes a ban on the adjacency of same-category elements. In the present work, data drawn from a typologically broad variety of languages suggest that the postulated constraints are not so robust. It is shown that X-within-X structures do exist in language. In this context, an argument is made in favor of an unrestricted conceptualization of Merge, independent from category distributions, while recursion is taken to be a property of procedures and not of structures. The discussion of X-within-X patterns provides insights with respect to the attested category distributions, the nature of categories, and the language faculty, from a biologically plausible point of view.
|
|
Keyword:
categories; complementizer doubling; demonstrative doubling; Merge; preposition doubling
|
|
URL: http://www.biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/361
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Fonaments neurològics del llenguatge: perspectives emergents ; Neurological foundations of language: emerging perspectives ; Fundamentos neurológicos del lenguaje: perspectivas emergentes
|
|
|
|
In: Llengua, societat i comunicació; Núm. 13 Cervell i llenguatge; 4 - 11 ; Lengua, sociedad y comunicación; Núm. 13 Cervell i llenguatge; 4 - 11 ; Language, society and communication; Núm. 13 Cervell i llenguatge; 4 - 11 ; 1697-5928 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Fonaments neurològics del llenguatge: perspectives emergents ; Neurological foundations of Language: Emerging Perspectives ; Fundamentos neurológicos del lenguaje: perspectivas emergentes
|
|
|
|
In: LSC– Llengua, societat i comunicació; 2015: Núm.: 13 Monogràfic: Cervell i llenguatge; p. 4-11 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
From Comparative Languistics to Comparative (Bio)linguistics: Reflections on Variation
|
|
|
|
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 8 (2014); 053-066 ; 1450-3417 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|