1 |
A Novel Pupillometric Method (Chapman & Hallowell, 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
A Novel Pupillometric Method (Chapman & Hallowell, 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Supplemental material, Chapman & Hallowell, "The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia," ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry
|
|
|
|
In: J Speech Lang Hear Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Validity of an Eyetracking Method for Capturing Auditory-Visual Cross Format Semantic Priming
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
A Novel Eye-Tracking Method to Assess Attention Allocation in Individuals with and without Aphasia Using a Dual-Task Paradigm
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
A new modified listening span task to enhance validity of working memory assessment for people with and without aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Exploring the Relationship between Attention Allocation and Working Memory Processes in Persons with and without Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A tutorial on aphasia test development in any language: Key substantive and psychometric considerations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Concurrent validation of an eyetracking-based method for assessing attention allocation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Validity of an Eye-Tracking Method for Capturing Auditory-Visual Cross-Format Semantic Priming
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Exploring online eye movement indices of attention allocation in aphasia
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
At 4000 ms post stimulus onset, effect sizes for main effects were largest, indicating greatest discrepancies in processing between groups, and greatest sensitivity to stimulus complexity differences. The results are important because they contribute to the development of more stringent eye-tracking protocols and improved validity of eye-tracking indices. They also enhance our understanding of the time course of attention allocation in the context studied and provide guidance for future studies.
|
|
URL: http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/2370/1/210-347-1-RV_%28Heuer_Hallowell%29.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
A novel pupillometric method for indexing word difficulty in adults with and without aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Relationships of real-time glucose levels on cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with and without diabetes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Exploring the Relationship between Working Memory Capacity and Attention Allocation in Persons with and without Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|