1 |
Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects
|
|
|
|
In: Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, Vol 47, Iss 0, Pp 1-18 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
A Cognitively Grounded Measure of Pronunciation Distance
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/~gooskens/pdf/publ_PLoS_ONE_2014.pdf (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Measuring dialect differences
|
|
|
|
In: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/HSK-Nerbonne-Web-Version2.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Associations among Linguistic Levels
|
|
|
|
In: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/shn2007lingua.pdf (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Detecting Contact Effects in Pronunciation
|
|
|
|
In: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/detecting-contact-pronunciation-2008.pdf (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
A Quantitative Analysis of Bulgarian Dialect Pronunciation
|
|
|
|
In: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/bulgarian1-2006.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
The relative divergence of Dutch dialect pronunciations from their common source: An exploratory study
|
|
|
|
In: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/w/w07/W07-1305.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
An aggregate analysis of pronunciation in the Goeman-Taeldeman-Van Reenen-Project data. Taal en Tongval
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/%7Eheeringa/dialectology/papers/tet06.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The Relative Contribution of Pronunciational, Lexical, and Prosodic Differences to the Perceived Distances between Norwegian Dialects
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/~gooskens/pdf/publ_litlingcomp_2006a.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Evaluation of string distance algorithms for dialectology
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W06/W06-1108.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Evaluation of string distance algorithms for dialectology
|
|
|
|
In: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/heeringa-et-al-coling-2006.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Measuring Norwegian Dialect Distances using Acoustic Features
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/%7Eheeringa/dialectology/papers/phl05.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A Dialectometric View of Linguistic “Gravity”
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/nerbonne/papers/gravity2004.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Dialect variation in and around Frisia: classification and relationships. Us Wurk: Tydskrift foar Frisistyk
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/%7Eheeringa/dialectology/papers/uswk04.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Norwegian dialects examined perceptually and acoustically
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/%7Eheeringa/dialectology/papers/cath02b.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Validating Dialect Comparison Methods
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/%7Eheeringa/dialectology/papers/gfkl00.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Computational comparison and classification of dialects. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/~heeringa/dialectology/papers/icdg97.pdf (2001)
|
|
Abstract:
In this paper a range of methods for measuring the phonetic distance between dialectal variants are described. It concerns variants of the frequency method, the frequency per word method and Levenshtein distance, both simple (based on atomic characters) and complex (based on feature bundles). The measurements between feature bundles used Manhattan distance, Euclidean distance or (a measure using) Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Variants of these using feature weighting by entropy reduction were systematically compared, as was the representation of diphthongs (as one symbol or two). The dialects were compared with each other directly and indirectly via a standard dialect. The results of comparison were classified by clustering and by training of a Kohonen map. The results were compared to wellestablished scholarship in dialectology, yielding a calibration of the methods. These results indicate that the frequency per word method and the Levenshtein distance outperform the frequency method, that feature representations are more sensitive, that Manhattan distance and Euclidean distance are good measures of phonetic overlap of feature bundles, that weighting is not useful, that two-phone representations of diphthongs mostly outperform one-phone representations, and that dialects should be directly compared to each other. The results of clustering give the sharper classification, but the Kohonen map is a nice supplement. 1 1
|
|
URL: http://www.let.rug.nl/~heeringa/dialectology/papers/icdg97.pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.99.3415
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
Computational Comparison and Classification of Dialects
|
|
|
|
In: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/icdg97.ps (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Change, convergence and divergence among Dutch and Frisian
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.let.rug.nl/%7Eheeringa/dialectology/papers/ffc99.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Dutch-German Contact In And Around Bentheim
|
|
|
|
In: http://grid.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/bentheim00.ps (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|