| 1 |
Developing semantic knowledge through cross-situational word learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.kachergis.com/docs/kachergis_yu_shiffrin_2014_priming.pdf (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Reviewed by:
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.kachergis.com/docs/kachergis_yu_shiffrin_2014frontiers_implicit.pdf (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Actively learning object names across ambiguous situations
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.kachergis.com/docs/kachergis_etal2013_active.pdf (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Actively Learning Object Names Across Ambiguous Situations
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.indiana.edu/~dll/papers/kachergis2012_active_topics.pdf (2012)
|
|
Abstract:
Previous research shows that people can use the co-occurrence of words and objects in ambiguous situations (i.e., containing multiple words and objects) to learn word meanings during a brief passive training period (Yu & Smith, 2007). However, learners in the world are not completely passive but can affect how their environment is structured by moving their heads, eyes, and even objects. These actions can indicate attention to a language teacher, who may then be more likely to name the attended objects. Using a novel active learning paradigm in which learners choose which four objects they would like to see named on each successive trial, this study asks whether active learning is superior to passive learning in a cross-situational word learning context. Finding that learners perform better in active learning, we investigate the strategies and discover that most learners use immediate repetition to disambiguate pairings. Unexpectedly, we find that learners who repeat only one pair per trial—an easy way to infer this pair—perform worse than those who repeat multiple pairs per trial. Using a working memory extension to an associative model of word learning with uncertainty and familiarity biases, we investigate individual differences that correlate with these assorted strategies.
|
|
Keyword:
Active learning; Cross-situational learning; Individual differences; Language acquisition; Statistical learning; Temporal contiguity
|
|
URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~dll/papers/kachergis2012_active_topics.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.412.8446
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Frequency and contextual diversity effects in cross-situational word learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://141.14.165.6/CogSci09/papers/521/paper521.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Prior knowledge bootstraps cross-situational learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2008/pdfs/p1930.pdf (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Cross-Situational Statistical Learning: Implicit or Intentional?
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.indiana.edu/%7Edll/papers/george_implicit_revised.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Hypothesis Testing and Associative Learning in Cross-Situational Word Learning: Are They One and the Same?
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.indiana.edu/~dll/papers/yu_cogsci07_cs.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Adaptive Constraints and Inference in Cross-Situational Word Learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.indiana.edu/%7Edll/papers/george_adaptive_revised.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Frequency and Contextual Diversity Effects in Cross-Situational Word Learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.indiana.edu/~dll/papers/kachergis_cont_div_freq09.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Hypothesis Testing and Associative Learning in Cross-Situational Word Learning: Are They One and the Same?
|
|
|
|
In: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2007/docs/p737.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
