DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 11 of 11

1
Developing semantic knowledge through cross-situational word learning
In: http://www.kachergis.com/docs/kachergis_yu_shiffrin_2014_priming.pdf (2014)
BASE
Show details
2
Reviewed by:
In: http://www.kachergis.com/docs/kachergis_yu_shiffrin_2014frontiers_implicit.pdf (2014)
BASE
Show details
3
Actively learning object names across ambiguous situations
In: http://www.kachergis.com/docs/kachergis_etal2013_active.pdf (2013)
BASE
Show details
4
Actively Learning Object Names Across Ambiguous Situations
In: http://www.indiana.edu/~dll/papers/kachergis2012_active_topics.pdf (2012)
BASE
Show details
5
Frequency and contextual diversity effects in cross-situational word learning
In: http://141.14.165.6/CogSci09/papers/521/paper521.pdf (2009)
BASE
Show details
6
Prior knowledge bootstraps cross-situational learning
In: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2008/pdfs/p1930.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
7
Cross-Situational Statistical Learning: Implicit or Intentional?
In: http://www.indiana.edu/%7Edll/papers/george_implicit_revised.pdf
BASE
Show details
8
Hypothesis Testing and Associative Learning in Cross-Situational Word Learning: Are They One and the Same?
In: http://www.indiana.edu/~dll/papers/yu_cogsci07_cs.pdf
BASE
Show details
9
Adaptive Constraints and Inference in Cross-Situational Word Learning
In: http://www.indiana.edu/%7Edll/papers/george_adaptive_revised.pdf
BASE
Show details
10
Frequency and Contextual Diversity Effects in Cross-Situational Word Learning
In: http://www.indiana.edu/~dll/papers/kachergis_cont_div_freq09.pdf
BASE
Show details
11
Hypothesis Testing and Associative Learning in Cross-Situational Word Learning: Are They One and the Same?
In: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2007/docs/p737.pdf
Abstract: Recent studies (e.g. Yu & Smith, in press; Smith & Yu, submitted) show that both adults and young children possess powerful statistical computation capabilities-- they can infer the referent of a word from highly ambiguous contexts involving many words and many referents. This paper goes beyond demonstrating empirical behavioral evidence-- we seek to systematically investigate the nature of the underlying learning mechanisms. Toward this goal, we propose and implement a set of computational models based on three mechanisms: (1) hypothesis testing; (2) dumb associative learning; and (3) advanced associative learning. By applying these models to the same materials used in learning studies with adults and children, we first conclude that all the models can fit behavioral data reasonably well. The implication is that these mechanisms – despite their seeming difference--may be fundamentally (or formally) the same. In light of this, we propose a formal unified view of learning principles that is based on the shared ground between them. By doing so, we suggest that the traditional controversy between hypothesis testing and associative learning as two distinct learning machineries may not exist.
Keyword: language acquisition; word learning
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.603.6649
http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2007/docs/p737.pdf
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
11
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern