3 |
Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies : Can it actually inform linguistic/ language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Language dominance affects bilingual performance and processing outcomes in adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Language dominance and transfer selection in L3 acquisition: Evidence from sentential negation and negative quantifiers in L3 English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Terminology matters! : Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers
|
|
|
|
In: International Journal of Bilingualism ; 22 (2018), 5. - S. 564-582. - ISSN 1367-0069. - eISSN 1756-6878 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
L1 acquisition across Portuguese dialects: Modular and interdisciplinary interfaces as sources of explanation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This article has two main goals. The first is to summarize and comment on the current state-of-affairs of generative approaches to SLA (GenSLA), thirty-five years into its history. This discussion brings the readership of SSLA up-to-date on the questions driving GenSLA agendas and clears up misconceptions about what GenSLA does and does not endeavor to explain. We engage key questions/debates/shifts within GenSLA such as focusing on the deterministic role of input in language acquisition, as well as expanding the inquiry to new populations and empirical methodologies and technologies used. The second goal is to highlight the place of GenSLA in the broader field of SLA. We argue that various theories of SLA are needed, showing that many existing SLA paradigms are much less mutually exclusive than commonly believed (cf. Rothman & VanPatten, 2013; Slabakova et al., 2014, 2015; VanPatten & Rothman, 2014) — especially in light of their different foci and research questions.
|
|
URL: https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69574/ https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69574/3/SSLA%20state-of-the-science%20FINAL.pdf https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69574/9/generative_approach_to_sla_and_its_place_in_modern_second_language_studies.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
11 |
Language dominance affects early bilingual performance and processing outcomes in adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: can it actually inform linguistic/ language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Towards eliminating arbitrary stipulations related to parameters: linguistic innateness and the variational model
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Why should formal linguistic approaches to heritage language acquisition be linked to heritage language pedagogies?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
When bilingualism is the common factor: switch reference at the junction of competence and performance in both second language and heritage language performance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Predicting executive functions in bilinguals using ecologically valid measures of code-switching behavior
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Bilingual cognition and language: the state of the science across its subfields
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|