DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 21

1
“She has many. cat?” : on-line processing of L2 morphophonology by Mandarin learners of English
Peretokina, Valeria (S31258); Best, Catherine T. (R11322); Tyler, Michael D. (R11374). - : Canberra, A.C.T., Australian Speech Science & Technology Association, 2016
BASE
Show details
2
Development of relative clause constructions in English L2
Yamaguchi, Yumiko; Kawaguchi, Satomi (R7941). - : Sydney, N.S.W., Australian International Academic Centre, 2016
BASE
Show details
3
The Acquisition of Passive Constructions in L2 English by Mandarin Speakers
Wang, Kenny (R14429). - : Germany, Lincom, 2016
BASE
Show details
4
Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-24 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
5
Test Fairness in Second Language Assessment
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 54-59 (2016) (2016)
Abstract: Fairness, an essential quality of a test, has been broadly defined as equitable treatment of all test-takers during the testing process, absence of measurement bias, equitable access to the constructs being measured, and justifiable validity of test score interpretation for the intended purpose(s) (AREA, APA, & NCME, 2014). Given that test fairness is closely related to the interpretations and uses of test scores as well as the claims made from those interpretations and uses, it is critical to obtain and weigh validity evidence to support or refute the score interpretations, their uses, and the potential socio-political consequences in order to evaluate fairness (Chalhoub-Deville, 2015; Haertel & Herman, 2005; McNamara & Roever, 2006). The purpose of this article is to describe how test fairness has been conceptualized in second language assessment through the lens of validity theories. First, I will describe construct- and interpretive-argument-based validity theories and how they accommodate the integration of test fairness. Then, following Xi (2010), three major approaches to conceptualizing test fairness in relation to validity will be discussed. As observed by Xi (2010), all three major approaches share a common caveat in that they do not provide concrete steps to prioritize evidence in fairness investigations. In an attempt to build a more comprehensive fairness argument that allows for systematic investigation of test fairness, Xi (2010) proposes a new approach to conceptualizing fairness within a validity framework. Her contribution to the understanding of fairness issues in language testing will be presented as part of the conclusion of this article.
Keyword: Applied linguistics; English language; Language acquisition; P118-118.7; PE1-3729; Second language acquisition; Second language assessment; Test fairness; Tests
URL: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8NG62KG
https://doaj.org/article/87f926d868b14809a5822f3398c97a6e
BASE
Hide details
6
Self- and Peer-Assessment of Speaking
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 68-83 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
7
Language, Migration, and Citizenship in France
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 46-53 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
8
Computer Mediated Collaborative Word Search in Online Tutoring: A Single Case Analysis
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 1-4 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
9
An Interview with APPLE Lecture Speaker Professor Brian MacWhinney
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-2 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
10
Embodied Vocabulary Explanation in ESL Group Interaction: A Preliminary Account
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 29-34 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
11
Managing the Participation of a Young Learner: A Multimodal Teacher Practice
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 24-28 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
12
Positive Feedback Loops: Sarcasm and the Pseudo-Argument in Reddit Communities
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 84-97 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
13
Learners’ privilege and responsibility: A critical examination of the experiences and perspectives of learners from Chinese backgrounds in the United States
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 60-63 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
14
Multimodality in the Classroom: An Introduction
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp i-vi (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
15
Signaling Learner Stance through Multimodal Resources
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 44-50 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
16
Ignoring Disadvantaged Students: Caveats of the ELA Regents Exam
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 38-45 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
17
The Effects of Visual Input on Scoring a Speaking Achievement Test
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 1-23 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
18
Assessing English Language Learners: Bridges to Educational Equity: Connecting Academic Language Proficiency to Student Achievement
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 63-67 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
19
Contribution with Hand-Raising in Graduate Student Self-Selection: Bringing Legitimacy to the Focal Shift of Talk
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 2, Pp 35-39 (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
20
Commentaries on Validity Issues in Foreign and Second Language Assessment
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp i-iii (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
21
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern