• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword:
    
  • 
    Creator / Publisher
  • 
    Year:
    
    • 2007 (4)
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 4 of 4 1 ii Preface Computational Morphology; Michael Dunn; Max Planck... In: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W07/W07-13.pdf (2007) BASE Show details 2 A Quantitative Analysis of Bulgarian Dialect Pronunciation Petya Osenova; Wilbert Heeringa; John Nerbonne In: http://odur.let.rug.nl/~nerbonne/papers/bulgarian1-2006.pdf (2007) BASE Show details 3 The relative divergence of Dutch dialect pronunciations from their common source: An exploratory study Wilbert Heeringa; Brian Joseph In: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/w/w07/W07-1305.pdf (2007) Abstract: In this paper we use the Reeks Nederlandse Dialectatlassen as a source for the reconstruction of a ‘proto-language ’ of Dutch dialects. We used 360 dialects from locations in the Netherlands, the northern part of Belgium and French-Flanders. The density of dialect locations is about the same everywhere. For each dialect we reconstructed 85 words. For the reconstruction of vowels we used knowledge of Dutch history, and for the reconstruction of consonants we used well-known tendencies found in most textbooks about historical linguistics. We validated results by comparing the reconstructed forms with pronunciations according to a proto-Germanic dictionary (Köbler, 2003). For 46 % of the words we reconstructed the same vowel or the closest possible vowel when the vowel to be reconstructed was not found in the dialect material. For 52 % of the words all consonants we reconstructed were the same. For 42 % of the words, only one consonant was differently reconstructed. We measured the divergence of Dutch dialects from their ‘proto-language’. We measured pronunciation distances to the protolanguage we reconstructed ourselves and correlated them with pronunciation distances we measured to proto-Germanic based on the dictionary. Pronunciation distances were measured using Levenshtein distance, a string edit distance measure. We found a relatively strong correlation (r=0.87). URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.145.8498 http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/w/w07/W07-1305.pdf BASE Hide details 4 An aggregate analysis of pronunciation in the Goeman-Taeldeman-Van Reenen-Project data. Taal en Tongval Martijn Wieling; Wilbert Heeringa; John Nerbonne In: http://www.let.rug.nl/%7Eheeringa/dialectology/papers/tet06.pdf (2007) BASE Show details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 4 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0